SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (103706)7/1/2003 2:13:07 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
'Only his premise is wrong' - hmm, you are convincing here, Neo ... yes, Lind may be quite wrong, and the current crop of militaristic neocons may have evolved not from trotskistas, but from stalinistas

Yes, it is coming clear now, i begin 'to get the idea' - it was indeed Stalin not Trotsky who preferred the use of military force, who kept his captive 'soviet' republics subject by brutal oppression, who murdered dissidents or caged them behind barbed wire in gulags set on occupied territory of siberian tribes, just as the neocons operate a camp set on occupied territorio cubano at Guantánamo, it was Stalin not Trotsky who at moment of convenience could make a deal to split up the land of the poles, and roll tanks over it .... hmmm, there will be more, for sure, but this is enough for now

So i concede to you, yes Lind may be wrong, and the roots of neocons are not to be found among the dissidents against Stalin, after all ...... well argued, amigo ... cháu