Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (421682)	7/2/2003 11:15:48 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Well, you can’t prove the negative. Some might resort to existentialist ignorance and declare we can never know whether the inductive clause never produces a homosexual; but empirical evidence ought to be enough for normal fokes to get on handily. F3 = (F1+M1) M3 = (F2+M2) YOU = (F3+M3) NOT (F3+F2) or (F3+F2+M3) or anything else. Pretty blame simple and obvious. We see it clearly in the definition above that fundamental human homogeneity simply does not exist. All objects in the definition are comprised of heterogeneous types. Never does an M or F type equal an (F+F) or (M+M). That is why true homosexuality does not exist. “Coupling” with another human of the same sex is foreign to our sexually heterogeneous identity in nature. (For the sake of the interested, an inductive clause of a recursive definition describes how elements of a fundamental set can be combined to produce new elements of the set. The inductive clause requires that objects in a set be combined in specific ways to create new objects.)