Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (103872)	7/2/2003 4:32:55 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You are such an incredible gasbag. I suppose people who didn't have the pleasure of dealing with the cozy little group of Clinton haters you always hung with might be taken in, but others might actually estimate that perhaps thou doth protest too much.

To: Neocon who wrote (103872)	7/2/2003 6:05:15 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Neocon, impeaching Clinton for fibbing about sex play with Monica, who led him on, was absurd. Impeachment is for high crimes and misdemeanours, not parking tickets, tit tickling, cigar poking and fellatio. A more reasonable case could be made for impeaching King George II for lying to Americans about the dreaded BigFoot and Yeti and the threat to Americans and the urgent need for a pre-emptive strike. There are a lot of dead and injured people now, including Americans, as a result of what seems to be a load of rot about Saddam being in bed with Al Qaeda [which is akin to thinking King George II would climb into bed with Tim McVeigh] and Saddam's amazing weapons of mass destruction. His WMDs are fewer than those in many other countries which threaten America or American interests - China, Pakistan, France, Russia, North Korea, and maybe a few more with chemicals, but we don't see pre-emptive strikes on them. The families of American soldiers might be inclined to start suing for damages. So might others. Milosevic's trial rolls on, but maybe there's a case for King George II to answer too. Personally, I'm happy with the attack on Saddam and think King George II, Blair and the troops have done a good job. If we have to have a dog eat dog world, which most Americans are in favour of, which leads to little problems like the Twin Towers being destroyed along with 1000s of people, I'd rather have George and Tony ruling the place than Saddam, Arafat and Mad Moslem Mullahs in Iran. Mqurice