SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Srexley who wrote (422192)7/2/2003 8:32:19 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
It was just one piece of evidence thrown out to a poster wh implies that Al Quida had nothing to do with 9-11.

Do you think they were involved?


Some people say they could not have been because the level of precision of the attacks was beyond their capabilities. Also none of the names of the "terrorists" were on the passenger lists or any aliases to account for them. How did they get on the planes? There was no signal from any pilot that they were hijacked although there is a covert way to activate an alarm that notifies ground control of a hijacking. No cockpit voice recorder has been allowed to be reviewed independently so we can hear the hijacking take place. All the recorders are under government control and kept secret (the one that were recovered). BUT....they were able to recover an only partially burned passport of one of the hijackers from one of the towers (who's name was not on the passenger list). How could a little passport be found in the aftermath of the inferno but they can't find the black box which was designed to survive anything including going straight into the ground at 600 knots? So I've seen some evidence that they were not involved but none yet that they were except the word of government officials who I will never trust. And Bush didn't act like we were under attack for some time afterwards either, like he was not surprised?