Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (171570)	7/3/2003 5:00:06 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583405

Ted, It was person specific. That's alright by me, but there was no way of figuring that out from the context. Maybe so but it was posted to D.Ray and it was over an issue we had discussed......but you're probably right. As for Israel/Palestine, IMO finding peace will have less to do with any one person and more to do with the two peoples involved. Not if there is a third party, including us, who is deeply involved. What are we going to do to be deeply involved? The best we can do, and its not insignificant, is withhold aid from Israel. However, having said that, that still doesn't mean Sharon will listen to us. He's blown off Bush in the past and he's capable of doing it in the future. I buy the theories posed by Jimmy Mac and Mani. The dual prospects of withdrawing aid to Israel and unleashing Sharon might be making both sides of the conflict more willing to negotiate. I think those actions will help but again, its the majority of the Israeli and Palestinian peoples who will ultimately decide if peace is possible. Until recently, they were not looking for peace. ted