Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (13390)	7/3/2003 6:25:21 PM
From: jrhana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

Make that the Glamis buyout In fact I just received a bit more than 200 shares of GLG in those accounts which were holding FGX-There had been some weird escrow notation for months-some accounting controversy.

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (13390)	7/3/2003 6:32:20 PM
From: Michael Bidder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

IMR I believe that the Geology and Geophysics done to date on the Navidad property have been done professionally for the following reasons. The analysts that went down to the property were told to collect their own rock samples and take them back to Canada to have them analysed. I’ve been told they came in with 30% higher values than what IMA had been reporting. This is easily verified by calling them. An independent company, Quantec Geoscience, did the IP survey. Then I satisfied myself with speaking to the principles, including one IMA Geologist, at their AMG pony show. Finally I spoke to a geologist friend of mine familiar with such things. He phoned their geologists and came away satisfied with their work. It's a small industry and people know people and word gets around. I believe that is what is holding the stock above $1 with a market cap above $50 million even in light of the CDU debacle. Check to see who owns the stock... Barrick, Institution, Insiders