Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (13436)	7/4/2003 10:39:25 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 39344

Michael, I share your optimism. But I am more prudent. I own it of course.

To: Michael Bidder who wrote (13436)	7/4/2003 3:45:36 PM
From: hank2010	Respond to of 39344

Michael you said "All I want is 100 meters of grade 100+ oz per ton over a width of say 1-3 meters." The width is what bothers me, or rather, the absence of width. They keep publishing fantastic grades over long lengths with no width dimension! Do you know if there is a legitimate reason for this, or is it incompetence of the samplers and their supervisors or an attempt to mis-lead? The property may be both legitimate and fantastic but the way they are reporting their work is disconcerting. I am somewhat reminded of FNX which reported great grades over great widths, with no indication of true widths. By the time they did report the true widths, most of the money had already been made!