SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (10429)7/5/2003 2:05:57 PM
From: Gottfried  Respond to of 95487
 
Don, also note that in the past 8 years for which I have data chip sales at todays level caused higher equipment orders than we see today. That's not even taking inflation into account.

home.comcast.net

Doesn't that equipment wear out? :) I read everywhere that businesses are trying hard to spend money just in time - and that extends to hiring. "When they come they come all at once"?

Gottfried



To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (10429)7/5/2003 2:54:58 PM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95487
 
Gottfried, That chart has a very powerful message - chip sales have been rising for the most part since January 02(10B to about 12.5B), but semi-equip bookings are essentially flat. The question is - how much further can chip sales rise without causing some increase in semi-equip spending?

The answer is "how much capacity did they build before the bubble crashed?"

The average is about $14B.... still above where we are today.



To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (10429)7/11/2003 2:06:28 AM
From: Pink Minion  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 95487
 
chip sales have been been bouncing around the 10 to 13 Billion dollar range for the past 8 years.

Imagine that. You can thank Moore's law for that. And this is factual data not arm-waving opinion. I guess the scary part is the stock prices are 4-5 times higher.

Anybody who thinks this Law makes for a good investment needs to take Econ 101. It has to be the most misquoted law out there.