Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (25096)	7/6/2003 12:07:12 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 25898

LOL! Raybo!!! As between your crediblity and Hawk's, I think everyone who reads this thread knows the conculsion that leads from the postings each of you have made as far a "lying" goes........Now why don't you slither back under your rock where you belong....

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (25096)	7/6/2003 2:33:59 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

prorev.com

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (25096)	7/6/2003 4:11:45 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

A classic example of Hawkmoon in action: Message 19028015

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (25096)	7/6/2003 5:21:28 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

That simply is not true. No Raymond.. It IS TRUE. Regardless whether the attack was intentional or not, the minute it became publicly known that a US ship had been attacked by Israeli forces, Tel Aviv issued an immediate apology. To do otherwise would have been incredibly stupid since it would have GENERATED credibility for the "intential attack" theory. History doesn't give a rat's @ss if you accept the facts or not. Denying widely reported and accepted historical facts is a losing battle Raymond.. It only further underlines just how much of a moron you obviously are. hnn.us On June 8, three days into the Six Day War, Israeli forces attacked the American spy ship. Israel immediately asserted that the attack was an error caused by the fog of war, apologized, and proceeded to pay compensation to the families. I also suggest you read the rest of the article.. Some very interesting discussion of the Strategic decision making process that was "at play" during this period. Considering how much you know about the subject matter, Unless you were actually privy to, or a participant in, the events surrounding the Liberty, then I know just as much as you do about WHAT REALLY HAPPENED, AND WHY... Only what you read second hand.... Hawk