SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Rose who wrote (423432)7/6/2003 12:14:59 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Well, I'm sure that those who made the mongrelization argument didn't think it was wrong, either.

Likely not, but nature was always objectively proving them wrong. They simply tried to avoid the truth. And in doing so they caused tragedy so great we are yet suffering from it.

Today, there are many lesbian couples who have their own children through the same means as infertile couples.

But no one is claiming infertility is a healthy alternative lifestyle. People roundly understand infertility to be a problem in need of a solution.

Male (and female) couples adopt kids who may otherwise have to grow up without parents.

When the adoption takes place in a heterosexual context, the human scheme is yet reflected. Humanity is maintained. Otherwise, it is perverse - corrupt.

If anything, these couples seem to be more loving and careful with their children, because of their position.

That is just no reason to force hetero society to accept what is foreign. Some people treat their pets very lovingly, as if the pets were born of them. But the fact is, such relationships are never to be considered the equals of genuine humanity. They are not. They lie quite outside of humanity.

The 'nature' argument simply does not fly in today's world.

And it is a pity, because as a result of this ignorance of reality, all manner of filth becomes "legitimate" - including homosexuality.