SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (423840)7/7/2003 2:00:29 PM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Yes and the sky is falling... Things will get better Kenneth.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (423840)7/7/2003 3:27:36 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
The HOLY WAR of W Jr

The Madness Of King George
by Harley Sorensen

Folks, our God-fearing president, George W. Bush, who claims to start every morning on his
knees praying, now says that he gets his orders from God Himself.

I kid you not.

I refer you to June 24 article by Arnon Regular in Ha'aretz, an Israeli newspaper. In the last
paragraph of that article there's a Bush quote as related by Palestinian Prime Minister
Mahmoud Abbas. Here, according to Abbas and Ha'aretz, is what Bush said:

God told me to strike at al Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at
Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East. If you
can help me I will act, and if not, the elections will come and I will have to focus on them.

That quote doesn't make clear whether God issues direct orders to Bush, or whether they
discuss things first. but I'd guess discussions. It's hard to imagine God deciding anything of
importance without without first getting input from Bush.

Over the years I've met a handful of people who regularly talk with God, but they usually do so
only when they're off their medications.

Those who get instructions directly from the Almighty are twice blessed: They get their orders
from the Highest Authority, and the orders are always to do what they would have done
anyway.

Getting direct orders from God makes a president's life simpler. If God has spoken, the
president doesn't have to observe the niceties with which presidents usually contend, things
like getting congressional approval or United Nations agreement.

Bush's very own personal God connection explains a lot of things. Like Bush's disinterest in
global warming.

Why should our duly elected president concern himself with global warming when God
Himself has said, "Don't worry, be happy"?

Do you see how it works? With God in your corner, it matters not what you do, because God
will protect you.

OK, I've been shilly-shallying around here, hesitant to come right out and say what I think, but
I'm becoming convinced that our president, the man with his finger on the nuclear trigger, is a
bona fide nutcase.

I really do. For him to say God told him to strike al-Qaida is just nutso. For him to say God
told him to strike at Saddam, ditto. This guy is not dealing with a full deck.

To me, Bush's sanity has been suspect for a long time. He does so many things that defy
logic, like his infamous tax cuts, approved by a thoroughly cowed Congress.

It doesn't make sense to reduce your income while increasing your spending and plunging
into massive debt.

His blithe attitude toward the public debt he is creating indicates a failure to grasp reality.

His cavalier entry into two wars within two years, in total disregard of world opinion on the
second one, indicates a man who just doesn't care what anyone thinks. Now that his
ill-planned schemes in Afghanistan and Iraq are coming apart, I sense a bit of panic in the
man.

Bush knew what everyone knew, that our armies could conquer. But he had no idea whether
they, or anyone, could maintain a peace in nations as splintered as Afghanistan and Iraq.
They can't. They're not trained for that. That's not their mission.

Bush is a good salesman, which is almost certainly why his father's friends chose him to be
the front man for the Republican Party. He's a charmer, no doubt of that. Because of his
sales ability, he was able to convince most Americans that war with Iraq was a necessity.

But America needs more than a slick salesman to lead the world. We need, at the very least,
a man with mental stability. We don't have that with Bush. His rapid rise to power, without
truly earning it as most presidents before him have done, has gone to his head.

So what we have in the White House today is a megalomaniac with a messianic complex, a
man who believes that he and he alone can resolve the world's problems.

"I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East," he said. I, I, I, I, I! With Bush it's
always "I." In a job that requires great humility, we have an egomaniac.

I don't expect many people to agree with my armchair psychoanalysis of a man I've never
met. We don't like to admit that important people are crazy, or even that our relatives are
crazy. Typically, we overlook their bizarre behavior until it gets so bizarre we can't ignore it
anymore.

So, all I ask is that you pay attention. A man who claims to get orders from God, and who
creates world-shaking events on the basis of those "orders," needs watching.

Harley Sorensen is a longtime journalist and liberal iconoclast. His column appears Mondays.
E-mail him at harleysorensen@yahoo.com.

CC



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (423840)7/7/2003 3:29:55 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Now BUSH is destroying OUR CHILDRENS' FUTURES.....WHEN WILL THE MADNESS STOP!!????

Some Fear Ruin for Head Start
See Disaster in Bill to Raise States' Role
by Lily Hindy

WASHINGTON - - New York Head Start officials fear that a bill pending in the House to
transfer control of Head Start funds from communities to the states will destroy the program,
particularly in New York.

Advocates of the program say the Republican proposal would allow cash-starved states to
merge Head Start funds with funding for existing state programs and would loosen current
federal monitoring requirements.

Regional Head Start president Ruth Neale said last week that the bill may "destroy Head
Start programs across the United States, but particularly here in New York," where Gov.
George Pataki has tried to cut funding for pre-kindergarten programs.

Head Start
provides
education,
medical services,
meals and other
assistance to
low-income
children under 5
with the goal of
making them
ready to compete
with more affluent
children when
they enter
school. It serves
more than 1
million
pre-schoolers,
including 49,000
in New York
State.

Supporters of the bill say it would simply improve a good program that has had no major
changes since its inception nearly 40 years ago. Parker Hamilton, a House Republican
spokeswoman, said sending the money to the states would help get rid of confusing
overlapping situations with state-run pre-kindergarten programs. But Neale fears that allowing
budget-strapped states to administer the money will result in reduced funding for Head Start
programs, as "states' priorities lie elsewhere."

"With the severe budget problems currently facing most states, [they] are not in a position to
administer something this complex and resource-rich at this time," Neale said.

In what has become a contentious debate, advocacy groups for Head Start have strongly
resisted recent attempts by congressional Republicans to restructure the program.

Early last month, the Bush administration released a report by the Department of Health and
Human Services showing that Head Start children had not been improving enough in
school-readiness. Soon after, the House Committee on Education and the work force passed
a Head Start reauthorization bill to the floor, saying its goals are to strengthen its academics,
require new teacher qualification standards, and allow states to better coordinate existing
childhood programs with Head Start programs.

The National Head Start Association, an advocacy group for the program, called the health
and human services report a "stale rehash of convenient slivers of information," and one of
many "desperate attempts" to gain support for the bill. Rather than improving the program,
the advocacy group says, the legislation will neglect comprehensive services, parent
involvement and overall quality performance standards.

President George W. Bush originally planned for all 50 states to participate, but in the House
bill eight states will be chosen for the five-year pilot program, allowing them to administer
Head Start funds. New York will probably be one of them, Neale said. Currently, Head Start
funds are granted directly to community groups from the federal government under the
condition that programs meet tough federal performance standards.

The bill requires that when states are given control of the funds, "the State standards
generally meet or exceed the standards that ensure the quality and effectiveness of programs
operated by Head Start."

Deputy Director Jean Davis from the Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County's
Head Start program is skeptical about this vague language.

"When it crosses to the state level, [the states] can create their own standards," said Davis.
"There are no guarantees. The resulting damage will be too much on the families."

Davis, whose commission runs eight programs in Nassau County serving 560 at-risk children,
says that without the strictly enforced federal standards, services provided will not be nearly
as extensive. She is particularly concerned about the quality of nutrition and health care Head
Start children receive.

In 2002 New York cut investments in state-funded pre-kindergarten programs, and this year
Pataki tried to do it again, but was blocked by the legislature. If New York is given control of
Head Start funds, Davis worries they will become a "pot of money" that will go to other
programs. States will be able to better coordinate Head Start programs with existing
pre-school programs under the bill, which its sponsors say will eliminate some confusion for
parents in deciding which is best for their children. Advocates are worried that parent
involvement, one thing Head Start prides itself on, will decline as its programs become
coordinated with other existing programs. Peter Chin, a single parent who has one child
currently enrolled in Freeport Head Start, is concerned about the pending legislation.
"Everyone feels comfortable with people at EOC Head Start. If states take over I think that
many parents will shy away from going into these programs."

The bill should be voted on in the House in coming weeks, and went through the
subcommittee and committee with approval on strict party lines. It may have a harder time in
the Senate.

Copyright © 2003, Newsday, Inc.
CC



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (423840)7/7/2003 4:24:45 PM
From: steve dietrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Better to be broke, than to be in so deep in debt you can't repay. Looks like the U.S. in insolvent.