Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (909)	7/8/2003 6:53:53 PM
From: JBTFD	Respond to of 20039

I'm short on free time today, but I will respond to a couple of your points. First I see this as a forum of ideas. I don't per se consider anyone's ideas to be the absolute truth, nor do I consider them to have to be defended as such. In this I think I differ from you. I am open to all ideas. The more sense they make and the more documentation to support an idea the more it may be taken seriously. As to your opinion being evident by default, that makes no sense to me. There are numerous versions of events that differ from what has been presented and may be construed as default positions. Which one is yours will only be known if you state it. I dont really care and am even less interested in guessing. But it does seem unfair to criticise everyone else's versions and then deny to present one of your own that would be subject to others' criticisms. To your credit, you do present an idea in the referenced post. I differ in opinion. I think that some other explanations of why 911 happened and why the powers that be are stonewalling any real investigation of it are just as likely as the incompetance theory or the intra-jurisdictional competition theory. The unfortunate thing is that if there is no investigation there will never turn up any proof, and the debate will never be put to rest.

To: LPS5 who wrote (909)	7/9/2003 12:54:00 AM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

<<<I'm quite sure that my opinion as to what took place that day is evident if in no other way than by default.>>> Just out of curiosity, what credible evidence would you present that OBL did it? Since you've no doubt subjected that particular theory to the same exacting standards you use to evaluate alternate explanations, I really would be interested in seeing your collection of hard core evidence to support your position. Will you waffle? My guess is you probably will as usual, but I'm prepared to keep an open mind and be surprised. Oh, and be sure to include the kind of documentation you demand from everyone else.