SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)8/14/2003 10:33:28 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Losing Afghan ground

courier-journal.com

BEFORE Iraq, of course, there was Afghanistan. That war,
too, was fought on the premise of removing danger to the
United States and on the promise of delivering a better
life to citizens suffering under a brutal dictatorship.


But success in lifting Afghans up to a decent level of
security and prosperity has not matched the aspirations
that shone briefly after an American-led military assault
overthrew the Taliban regime and scattered its al-Qaida
"guests" in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai often appears to be in
control of little of his country beyond the capital city,
Kabul. Elsewhere, warlords, bandits and even Taliban
remnants have filled a dispiriting void.

One result is that the men who pass themselves off as
police and militia are often loyal to warlords, ethnic
factions and commanders of the Northern Alliance that
took control after the Taliban's defeat. A shocking report
by the New York-based Human Rights Watch documents
widespread extortion, armed robbery, rape and abductions
by these police and soldiers.


Tragically, some provincial leaders have reimposed severe
anti-feminine practices, and in some areas Afghan women, who only months ago
celebrated the end of the Taliban's odious sexual oppression, must again wear
the burqa.

A recent Washington Post report catalogued many other ways in which
Afghanistan's economy and society remain shattered.

Schoolchildren frequently attend classes outdoors in heat and cold so extreme
that many become ill. Plumbing is primitive even in much of Kabul. Major roads
are still unpaved and barely passable. Farmers, deprived of usable irrigation
systems and adequate incomes from legitimate crops, have again made
Afghanistan the world's largest opium producer. Few Afghans can find jobs with
adequate wages, and some government employees, including legitimate police,
haven't been paid in months.

Some of the blame must be directed at the international community, including
the United States, for failing to deliver on billions of dollars in promised
economic assistance. Moreover, the United States also maintains security
arrangements with regional military commanders, an unwise policy that
undermines Mr. Karzai and strengthens some of the worst violators of human
rights.


President Bush promised in his latest press conference to "complete our mission
in Afghanistan" and to keep America's word. In this regard, reports that the
administration plans a new $1 billion aid package are heartening. The money
would be focused on security, education and infrastructure needs.

But additional assistance will be required. For Americans, such aid should seem
a bargain. The United States currently spends about $10 billion annually in
Afghanistan, most of it to support about 9,000 American troops. If hardship and
violence are not reduced in Afghanistan, it will be difficult to shrink the
American military presence and could become necessary to increase it.

The administration should also put intense pressure on other countries to
increase their contributions to aid and peace-keeping.

The stakes for America and many other nations in creating safety and economic
progress in Afghanistan are obvious. But turning lofty goals into reality will take
much more than good intentions.



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)9/1/2003 2:01:47 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
US troops die in week-long fight with Taliban

Hundreds of guerrillas battle it out in Afghan
mountains

Gary Younge in New York
Monday September 1, 2003
The Guardian

Two American soldiers died in a gun battle in eastern
Afghanistan yesterday as hundreds of Taliban fighters poured
into the southern mountains to join a week-long battle against
Afghan and US forces.

Four Taliban insurgents were killed and an American soldier
injured as a US combat patrol came under fire, a US military
official said.

"The US forces were conducting a combat mission in the vicinity
of a firebase near Shkin when the engagement occurred," a
statement by the US military said. "Two of the soldiers died of
wounds received during the initial contact with enemy fighters
north-west of Shkin, in Paktika province, this morning."

There are increasing signs that the fundamentalist Taliban
regime has been deposed, but not completely defeated,
following an upsurge in guerrilla attacks in the past fortnight that
have killed more than 100 people, including dozens of
government troops.

US fighter jets supporting heavily armed Afghan soldiers have
met with stiff resistance in the seven days of fighting in the
southern province of Zabul. An American special operations
soldier was killed last Friday in a fall during a combat operation
there.

"Fighting has escalated today," Khalil Hotak, the US-backed
Afghan regime's intelligence chief in the province, told Reuters
news agency yesterday. "The bombardment has intensified, so
has the shelling, but the Taliban are bitterly resisting."

The clashes in Zabul extend the worst wave of violence in
Afghanistan since the Taliban was ousted from power. Much of
the bloodshed has been blamed on the militia, which has
declared a holy war on foreign troops, aid organisations and their
supporters.

By all accounts, the Taliban fighters have suffered the heaviest
casualties. A US military spokesman, Colonel Rodney Davis,
said on Saturday that 33 Taliban fighters had been killed in the
south in recent fighting, but Afghan officials put the insurgent
death toll much higher.

The coalition has 11,500 soldiers - 10,000 of them American -
hunting down Taliban and al-Qaida fighters, mainly in the south
and east of the country. The Dai Chupan district, an area of
rugged mountain gorges and ridges, is believed to be a Taliban
stronghold from where the guerrillas launch operations in
neighbouring provinces.

An Afghan military commander speaking from Larzab, one of the
frontlines in the battle, said yesterday that intelligence indicated
more Taliban reinforcement fighters had arrived in the area.

"We have information that more than 250 Taliban entered Dai
Chupan district from the neighbouring district of Mizan," General
Haji Saifullah Khan, who is leading the Afghan soldiers against
the Taliban, told the Associated Press.

The offensive against the Taliban in Dai Chupan was launched
last Monday, when Afghan officials said US warplanes bombed
a mountain hideout near Dozai, killing at least 14 of the
insurgents. The fighting has since spilled into other areas in the
district. The clashes involve up to 1,000 Afghan troops and a
similar number of Taliban guerrillas.

Early yesterday four helicopter gunships and three US fighter
jets targeted suspected Taliban hideouts in the Chinaran, Ragh
and Kabai areas of Dai Chupan, according to Mr Hotak.
Representatives of the Afghan regime say they have the
insurgents cornered. The Taliban claim they are holding their
own and are digging in for the long fight.

Taliban sources told news agencies that they had shot down a
US helicopter last Thursday, killing five American soldiers.
Afghan officials deny the claim.

In all, 35 American soldiers have been killed in action in
Afghanistan, and 162 injured due to hostilities, the US military
said.

• A lack of funds could delay voter registration planned to start in
October for next year's Afghan general election, a UN
spokesman said yesterday. The UN has said the registration will
cost about $80m, but a spokesman, Manoel de Almeida e Silva,
said the response had been slow from donor states helping to
rebuild the country after two decades of war.

The registration process was due to start in October and last
until at least March 2004, before the elections scheduled for
June next year.

A commission charged with drafting a new constitution is also
experiencing delays, and this could also force the general
election to be postponed.

guardian.co.uk



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)9/24/2003 7:51:29 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Afghan warlords harvest their cut
Amy Waldman/NYT NYT
Thursday, September 25, 2003

SHOLGARAH VALLEY, Afghanistan The fighting
in this fertile bowl flared as the harvest neared,
and that was not a coincidence. From bountiful
crops of cotton, corn and wheat would come a cut
for local commanders. The more land the
commanders controlled, the more crop they could
claim. So in a place ostensibly at peace 20 months
after the Taliban's fall, they went to war.

Throughout early summer, men toting weapons
roamed in pickup trucks. Gunshots echoed.
Farmers watched helplessly, wanting nothing
more than to be free of the men who had once
fought for their freedom.

Unimpeded by a weak government, the warriors
whom Afghans mustered to fight first the Soviets
and then the Taliban are fighting one another for
coarser causes these days - land, money, power.

They outgun the police, while collecting for
themselves taxes that Afghan officials say could be
used to build a stronger police force.


As the United States prepares to increase its
investment in Afghanistan in the hope of
extending the central government's reach, the
northern region where this valley sits shows how
limited that reach is. In many places, the most
tangible evidence of a state is a picture of
President Hamid Karzai.

"We are the representatives of the government,
but we have nothing, and they have everything,"
the Sholgarah district police chief, Ridar Akbari,
said of the militias. He estimated that 500 or more
well-equipped commanders and soldiers had
settled in the valley. To police its 118 villages, he
has 48 police officers - earning between $15 and
$30 a month - 10 Kalashnikov assault rifles and a
jeep.

"I cannot do anything when they fight," he said. It
is the same across much of the country.

For Afghans, the power of these local chieftains
means living with the constant threat of extortion,
of forcible recruitment, fighting and the
displacement of families, and the possibility of
being denied access to land or water.

It also means living without a neutral state,
because loyalties in the local and regional
governments are divided. The governor is from one
faction, the mayor from another, the police chief
from a third.

Tense as the situation is, no one thinks it will
erupt into civil war, if only because it is in no
one's interest. "It is a fragile balance of power, but
it is a balance of power," said Michele Lipner, the
head of the Mazar-i-Sharif office of the UN
Assistance Mission to Afghanistan.

While the national army has no presence here yet,
the two main factions, Jamiat-e-Islami, led by
General Ostad Atta Muhammad, and Jumbesh,
led by General Abdul Rashid Dostum, each
maintains its own military corps, partly paid for by
the Ministry of Defense.

By the thousands, lower-level commanders,
sometimes answerable only to whoever has most
recently paid them, also are spread out across
remote districts, where they fight for control.

"It's pretty ugly," said Karzai's chief of staff, Said
Tayab Jawad. "How can you have a free election in
a big city like Mazar, let alone a small village?"

That concern has prompted an influx of new
resources. The Americans are building a new
police training center in Mazar. This summer, a
British team of about 70 soldiers and a few
civilians arrived to deploy across five provinces.

That civilian-military team is one of four spread
around the nation. The Bush administration is
adding, with the help of other countries, at least
four.

The team leader, Colonel Dickie Davis, said he
had tried to promote peace by verifying security
deals between the factions and shooting down
rumors.

Working with Lipner's office, the team removed 25
top commanders from this valley in early August,
bringing an instant, if tentative, calm. When the
commanders sneaked in, Davis led a patrol to
escort them out again.

Residents were pleased but skeptical about
whether the peace would last.

Davis concedes his limits working in five provinces
that are home to 5.5 million people. "All the
soldiers of the Russian Army couldn't subdue this
place, and here I am with 70 soldiers," he said.
"They have to agree to stop fighting. We can't
make them."

He believes, he said, that Muhammad and Dostum
truly see the political process as the way forward.
But others see a dual reality: warlords wearing the
suits of statesmen while dispatching soldiers to
sully peaceful places. Always, there is a prize to be
had.

In the Sholgarah Valley, the prize is osher, an
Islamic tax given as a portion of a crop. This valley
is rich enough that its crops are legal. Elsewhere,
the prize is a piece of the year's bumper poppy
crop and the opium trade, which in some cases is
so empowering midlevel commanders that they
are no longer accountable to their factional
leaders.

"It should be for the government," said Abdul
Sami, a farmer who reluctantly gives up 10
percent of his yield to the local Jamiat
commander, although admittedly the government
does not have tax collectors.

The commanders and their soldiers are above the
law, said Akbari, the police chief. When he tries to
investigate soldiers for beating a villager who
resists their extortion, their superiors tell him to
stay out of military matters.

"I am ashamed in front of the people of the district
that I couldn't bring peace and stability," Akbari
said. He sometimes tells those with guns, "In the
future, people will come to the police chief and
complain you did something, and I will imprison
you."

In the present, they laugh at him.

The New York Times

iht.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)9/24/2003 8:19:03 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Taliban Vow Attacks After Mullah Omar Meeting

story.news.yahoo.com
By Saeed Ali Achakzai

SPIN BOLDAK, Afghanistan (Reuters) - Islamic Taliban
commanders secretly met elusive leader Mullah Mohammad Omar last
week and vowed to step up attacks on Afghan government and U.S.-led
allied troops, a commander said on Wednesday.

Taliban guerrilla commander Mullah Sabir,
alias Mullah Momin, told Reuters by
telephone from an undisclosed location that
Omar appeared "delighted" by a recent spate
of Taliban attacks.

At the meeting on September 17, held
somewhere in southern Afghanistan (news -
web sites), Omar urged around 50 top military
commanders and former governors not to slow
their activities, Mullah Momin said.

"I salute my Taliban mujahideen (holy warrior)
brothers and the Afghan people. They have
courageously carried out their jihadi (holy war)
responsibilities for the last two years to
defend Islam," Omar was quoted as saying.

"All the Taliban commanders should carry out the duties entrusted to
them as a personal responsibility," he added.

Mullah Momin said he had started spreading Omar's message to other
Taliban commanders who were not present at the meeting, adding that
the leaders had agreed to "accelerate" attacks.

On Wednesday, the U.S.-led military force in Afghanistan said 10
rockets had landed near two of its bases in the southeast of the country
the previous night, but caused no casualties.

Two of the rockets landed near a base at Asadabad and eight others
near a base at Shkin, military spokesman Major Richard Sater told a
news briefing.

He said U.S.-led forces fired mortars at the suspected launch site in
Asadabad last night, but gave no other details.

Such attacks, which have been an almost daily occurrence in
Afghanistan in the past year but generally ineffective, have been blamed
in past on Taliban guerrillas.

TALIBAN CAPTURED

In another incident on Tuesday, Afghan forces captured four Taliban
guerrillas in the Suri area of Zabul province, Commander Haji Mohammad
told Reuters, adding that a cache of arms had been found during the
raid.

The United States toppled the Taliban in Afghanistan for providing a safe
haven to Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) and his al Qaeda network
after the September 11, 2001, attacks.

But in the last few months the Taliban has carried out a spate of attacks
and Afghan government officials blame their resurgence on support from
neighboring Pakistan.

Since the start of August, more than 280 people have been killed and
scores wounded across Afghanistan, among them civilians, Afghan aid
workers, police and militiamen, three U.S. soldiers and many Taliban
guerrillas.

The 12,500-strong U.S.-led force launched Operation Mountain Viper last
month in response to the presence of hundreds of guerrillas and their
allies in Uruzgan and Zabul provinces.

President Hamid Karzai told President Bush (news - web sites) on
Tuesday he was concerned that some people in the border regions of
neighboring Pakistan were preaching support for the Taliban.

During the 45-minute meeting, Bush promised to
raise the issue with Pakistani President Pervez
Musharraf on Wednesday.

Pakistan strongly supported Mullah Omar's Taliban
regime but abandoned him after the September 11
attacks, and is now a key ally in the U.S.-led "war on
terror."



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)10/9/2003 8:38:59 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Red Cross faults U.S. on terror detainees
Neil A. Lewis/NYT NYT
Friday, October 10, 2003

Guantánamo base called 'intolerable'

GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba The International
Committee of the Red Cross has broken a long
public silence about the detention of more than
600 prisoners held here by the United States
military, saying that the situation is
"unacceptable" because it is open-ended and
without proper legal process.


Christophe Girod, the senior Red Cross official in
Washington, said in an interview Thursday at the
naval base here that "one cannot keep these
detainees in this pattern, this situation
indefinitely."

Girod spoke as he and a team of officials from the
committee were completing their latest inspection
tour of the prison camp.

While he did not criticize any of the physical
conditions at the camp, which houses about 660
prisoners, most of them captured two years ago in
the Afghan war, he said it was "intolerable" that
the place was being used as "an investigation
center, not a detention center."

United States officials have said that they have
begun moving to sort out the prisoners, selecting
which ones to release and which ones to bring
before military tribunals on criminal charges.

But some officials, notably Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld, have said that the prisoners
might have to be held until what he said was the
conclusion of the global war on terrorism.

Girod said that "the open-endedness of the
situation and its impact on the mental health of
the population has become a major problem."
There have been 32 suicide attempts by 21
prisoners over the last two years.

Human rights groups have said that the high
incidence of such events as well as the number of
detainees being treated for clinical depression is
the direct result of the uncertainty of their
situation.

Girod said that in meetings with members of his
inspection teams, inmates regularly asked what
was going to happen to them. "It's always the No.
1 question," he said. "They don't know about the
future."

Camp officials have asserted that most of the
mental health problems existed before the men
were brought to the camp.

The Red Cross, based in Switzerland, is the only
outside group that has been given access to Camp
Delta, as the main prison facility is called.

Under longstanding procedures, the committee
agrees that in exchange for access, it will not
generally publicize its findings but rather take
any complaints or criticisms to the government in
hopes they can be addressed. Only when the Red
Cross decides its views are not being addressed
does it publicize its concerns.

Girod said that the position he was expressing
had been on the organization's Web site for some
days.

He said that the Red Cross had been urging the
Bush administration to "make significant changes"
in the operation at Guantánamo if it intended to
keep using it as an investigation center.

The plans of officials to begin sorting out the
prisoners, however deliberately, may be slowed
even further by recent events. A team of
investigators from the U.S. Army's Southern
Command, based in Miami, began work
Wednesday to determine if there has been any
concerted effort to infiltrate the prison camp by
using employees.

In recent weeks, two translators, one an air force
enlisted man, the other a civilian contract
employee, have been arrested on suspicion of
espionage. Officials said they were discovered to
have taken classified information off the island
and are suspected of having tried to carry
messages from detainees abroad.

More striking, the base's Islamic chaplain, Captain
James Yee, also known as Youssef Yee, was
arrested on suspicion of espionage. Customs
officers found a map of the base in his belongings
as he was departing for home leave. They said he
also appeared to possess messages from
detainees.

The New York Times



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)10/11/2003 2:29:35 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Judges condemn Camp X-Ray

Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
Saturday October 11, 2003
The Guardian

Judges and lawyers from around the world yesterday
condemned the US treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay
in Cuba as a violation of international law.


The International Bar Association's task force on international
terrorism said: "States cannot hold detainees, for which they are
responsible, outside of the jurisdiction of all international courts
."

The task force was led by Justice Richard Goldstone, a judge of
South Africa's constitutional court and former chief prosecutor of
the international tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda,
and Emilio Cardenas, president of the IBA and Argentina's
ambassador to the UN. The UK delegate is the Labour peer
Helena Kennedy.

Speaking from Washington, DC, where the report was launched,
Justice Goldstone noted that there had been dozens of suicide
attempts at Guantanamo Bay where prisoners deemed "enemy
combatants" are being held indefinitely outside US territory. The
US authorities plan to try them by military commission with no
right of appeal.

Justice Goldstone said: "The law just doesn't accept black
holes. If they're prisoners of war they've got rights under the
Geneva convention. If they're civilians they've got rights under the
domestic law of the US.

"It's unacceptable and inconsistent with the rule of law that
you're holding 662 people without any access to due process.
They're at the mercy of Pentagon officials."


The report coincided with a statement from the International Red
Cross. Wrapping up a two-month visit to the base, the
organisation, the only independent group with access to the
detainees, said it had found a "worrying deterioration" in their
mental health.

The IBA task force also suggests the US/UK strike on Iraq was
questionable under international law.
It says: "The task force
has grave doubts as to whether claims of self-defence justify,
per se, unilateral action to engage in armed intervention in any
country that has not attempted an attack or threatened
international peace and security."

The task force calls for adherence to a set of fundamental
principles of law in the fight against terrorism. Among the first
principles, it says, is that states should not use the threat of
terrorism to disregard international law.

Justice Goldstone added: "The new scale of terrorism has
produced greater challenges for all of us. International
cooperation will be critical to the protection of citizens in the
21st century."

guardian.co.uk



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)11/22/2003 7:43:09 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
When Soldiers Go Without Paychecks
Editorial
The New York Times


November 21, 2003

Members of the National Guard and the various military reserves joined
up to be part-time civilian soldiers, called up during domestic
emergencies and in time of war. This model was coming to an end even
before the war in Iraq. Stretched thin by the peacekeeping missions
of the 1990's, the Pentagon was already calling up more part-timers
and stationing them abroad for longer. But the invasion and occupation of Iraq
have magnified the problem.

If the Defense Department wants the reservists to be full-time, long-term
soldiers, it is especially important that it end the unfair practice of
paying them late - or not at all - for months on end.
A new report from the General Accounting Office blames a payroll system
so primitive and error-prone that few people fully understand it.
The system fails because the people who run it often do not know
how to process active-duty pay for
mobilized reservists. As a result, soldiers sometimes spend months
waiting for the pay they have earned.

In one striking case, a Special Forces unit deployed in Afghanistan
for a year received incorrect paychecks for 11 months, capped by largely
erroneous statements saying that each soldier, on average, owed the
federal government $48,000. In another case, a sergeant stationed in
Uzbekistan who could not get his unit paid was forced to carry the
soldiers' personnel data by hand to headquarters in Kuwait - a dangerous trip,
during which he came under fire.

The fact that this problem has plagued reservists for years makes
it even more inexcusable. The Pentagon needs to fix the payroll system quickly. If
reservists are going to risk their lives in battle, as others in uniform do,
the least we can do is pay them on time.


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
nytimes.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)12/14/2003 12:40:46 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Guerrilla chiefs to undercut Karzai

Afghanistan's Soviet-era guerrillas will control a majority at the
constitutional loya jirga, scheduled to open this weekend.
By Scott Baldauf | Staff writer of The

Christian Science Monitor

KABUL, AFGHANISTAN - Afghanistan's constitutional convention,
scheduled to start Saturday, was supposed to be a break from the
feuds of the past, a made-for-TV demonstration that the war-torn
country had united around a blueprint for democracy.

Now a coalition of powerful guerrilla commanders is poised to wrest
control of the proceedings and redraft the new Afghan constitution
according to their own wishes.


Led by a broad array of religious parties
from Afghanistan's many Islamic sects
and ethnic groups, these mujahideen or
"holy warriors" have set their sights on
diluting the sweeping powers of President
Hamid Karzai by pursuing a
parliamentary system. It would be a
setback for American officials who
consider Mr. Karzai to be the best leader
for the next Afghan government.

Karzai raised the stakes Wednesday
saying he would not seek reelection if the
guerrilla's gambit succeeds.


"If there is a parliamentary system, I will
not be a candidate," he said. "If the loya
jirga decides to bring a prime minister, let
them do it."

To the dismay of the American
government, the mujahideen have the
numbers on their side.
Of the 500
delegates selected during the past few
weeks for Saturday's constitutional loya
jirga, or grand council, more than 70
percent are associated with mujahideen
parties, according to a survey by Agence
France Presse. Among the remaining 30
percent, some are aligned with Karzai,
while others are monarchists, who favor some official role for the
elderly king.

"If [Karzai] doesn't follow the loya jirga, then there could be turmoil,
political fighting. Karzai will only be making more opposition against
his government," says Abdul Hafiz Mansoor, a senior official in the
Jamiat Islami, an Islamist party that fought the Soviet occupation of
Afghanistan during the 1980s.

While the Karzai government says it welcomes a full and frank
discussion on the future constitution - and US diplomats say they
anticipated opposition all along - this is clearly not the loya jirga that
they wanted. Far from a 10-day rubber stamp of the present
constitution draft, which gives sweeping powers to the presidency
and makes few provisions for checks and balances on his power, the
loya jirga could well turn into a heated affair that sets faction against
faction and leaves the US-backed Afghan leader weaker than when
he started. In addition, some insiders now predict that the process
could drag out for many weeks, and even months.

The actual drafting of the constitution appears to have been a rather
quiet affair. The constitutional commission, representing members of
all ethnic groups, sects, and regional groups, spent the last nine
months cobbling together a document largely based on the
constitution of 1964.

When the draft was released a month ago, international reaction was
warm and positive. Human rights groups hailed its protection for the
rights of women and ethnic and religious minorities. Religious
conservatives supported the provisions that declare Afghanistan an
Islamic state.

The constitution draft has some other 21st-century touches. While
guaranteeing the primacy of Islam, the draft constitution also protects
freedom of religious practice. And the draft also would make school
compulsory, both for boys and girls.

But underneath this shower of praise, there was an undercurrent of
discontent. Former guerrilla commanders, now under pressure to
disarm, worried that they would be shut out of the power game
forever. And the seven religious parties that once struggled among
themselves for control of Kabul - killing an estimated 50,000 people
from 1992 to 1996 - now appear to be reuniting in order to remain a
political force.

For the past two weeks, mujahideen leaders, including Defense
Minister Mohammad Fahim, Yunis Qanooni, Abdul Rab Rasool
Sayaaf, Kareem Khalili, and the late Ahmed Shah Masood's brother,
Ahmed Wali, have been holding a series of meetings - often over
dinner - to discuss strategy. Loya jirga delegates supportive of these
mujahideen groups have been studying up and honing their
arguments in favor of a parliamentary system.

"We have invited hundreds of delegates last night and had a large
discussion on the issues," says Aqa Mohammad Nazari, a senior
leader in Jamiat Islami. "The majority want a parliamentary system
with a prime minister. People do not want a dictatorship. They do not
want complete power to be in one man's hands, whether it's Karzai or
somebody else."

The mujahideen have some unlikely allies in the drive for a
parliamentary system. Those who have attended the meetings say
that members of the monarchist party, the Movement for National
Unity of Afghanistan, have also been discussing ways to rewrite the
constitution and weaken the powers of the presidency.

Under the current draft, the president could sack officials and remove
regional governors at will. While the draft allows for a legislative body,
the president could encroach on its authority through decrees.

Western diplomats say privately that any move to weaken the
president would make the Afghan government less effective. "It is
only because Karzai has these powers that we're starting to see
things getting done," says one senior US diplomat.

But publicly, US diplomats say that the very fact that it's possible to
hold a constitutional convention to discuss these issues shows that
Afghans have more freedom.

"The Afghans are discussing issues that they have not discussed ...
during their past 5,000 year history," said US ambassador Zalmay
Khalilzad, in a recent press gathering in Kabul. "They are debating it
with freedom and with confidence."

Drafters of the constitution say that reaction to the draft thus far has
been positive. "Everyone who reads this constitution is agreeing, not
arguing," says Abdul Salam Azimi, deputy chairman of the
constitutional commission.

While the mujahideen point to their overwhelming support of loya jirga
delegates as evidence that they represent the true voice of the
people, many Afghans themselves voice concerns that a prolonged
power struggle could push the nation once again into violent
factionalism.

A recent survey of 1,500 Afghans from various provinces by the aid
group CARE showed that most Afghans are more interested in
improvements in security and economic growth than in political
loyalties. Asked what they would do first if they were president, 43
percent said they would improve security by beefing up police and
disarming warlords. Forty percent said they would focus on job
creation, health care, or education. Only 7 percent said they would
focus on the balance of ethnic or tribal groups in the government.

Among ordinary Afghans, Safia Niazi is probably typical. Principal of
a girls' high school in Kabul, she is neither satisfied with the present
government nor happy with the savage history of infighting among the
mujahideen. Instead, Ms. Niazi says she simply wants to see a
country safe enough to send children to school.

"I've read this constitution, and it's very good for the people of
Afghanistan," she says. "But we will see what the people of
Afghanistan do with the constitution. Will they follow it or not?"

But while many Afghans blame the mujahideen for four years of civil
war that destroyed the city of Kabul and ushered in the harsh Taliban
regime, mujahideen officials themselves say they are ready to share
power, and rule maturely.

"During the jihad [holy war] the Afghan people gave their own sons to
the guerrilla leaders to fight the jihad, knowing they would be killed,"
says Nazari. "They trusted the mujahideen then, but now these
people are called warlords. Why? We are the same people."

csmonitor.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)12/14/2003 12:58:27 AM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Revealed: shocking truth of Britain's 'Camp Delta'

Martin Bright, home affairs editor
Sunday December 14, 2003
The Observer

Disturbing new details have emerged about the treatment of 14
foreign terrorist suspects held without trial in British
high-security jails.

At least half of them are showing signs of serious mental illness.
Their lawyers say they have been pushed 'beyond the limits of
human endurance'. One detainee is a polio victim, another has
lost two limbs and a third has attempted suicide.


The men and their families fear some may not survive their
indefinite imprisonment at Belmarsh prison in south-east
London, which has been described as 'Britain's Guantanamo
Bay' or 'Camp Delta UK', and Woodhill prison near Milton
Keynes, Buckinghamshire.

The Home Office has said that none will be granted bail unless
they are terminally ill.

The men, who cannot be named for legal reasons, have been
described as a serious threat to national security. But the
Observer has discovered that two are seriously disabled and
most have been on anti-depressant drugs for more than a year.

There are particular concerns about a North African in his
thirties, who has suffered from polio since childhood. His mental
health has deteriorated so much that he can no longer recognise
or communicate with fellow inmates.

His condition worsened after he was confined to his cell by his
illness. The prison authorities refused him a wheelchair, and
inmates' offers to carry him to classes and prayers were
rejected.

A second North African has no arms and has to be helped by
fellow prisoners to carry out everyday tasks. A Palestinian
detainee Abu Rideh was transferred to Broadmoor high security
psychiatric hospital after trying to kill himself over a year ago
and has been there ever since.

The men's morale was seriously hit by the failure of 10 appeals
against the internments. The men's lawyers fear those who have
kept their sanity have become exhausted by acting as full-time
carers for the others.

The suspects are being held under emergency anti-terrorist
legislation introduced two years ago this week. A Home Office
spokesman said they had regular access to mental health
services and any special needs of disabled prisoners was taken
into account. Belmarsh also had a team of mental health
specialists including three psychiatrists and three psychiatric
nurses.

The highest-profile prisoner is Abu Qatada, a British-based
Palestinian cleric whose demands for a holy war are alleged to
have inspired al-Qaeda. Videos of his sermons were found in the
flat of the leader of the 11 September attacks, Mohamed Atta.

The detainees have been charged with no crime; are unable to
see the intelligence evidence against them; and are confined to
their cells for up to 22 hours a day. The Government used
emergency legislation against them because it had insufficient
evidence to mount a prosecution.


Gareth Peirce of law firm Birnberg Peirce, which represents
most of the men, said: 'They have now been pushed beyond the
limits of human endurance. All these men are refugees and a
number are torture victims. It is well-established that victims of
torture should not be confined, because this can trigger former
trauma.'

Peirce will raise her concerns tomorrow in a lecture for the
human rights organisation Liberty at the London School of
Economics to mark the second anniversary of the detainees'
arrests.

Natalia Garcia, a solicitor with two internee clients in Woodhill
prison, said: 'They have a feeling of total despair. One has told
me that he feels he has been buried alive. It is as if the whole
weight of the state is against you and there is nothing you can
do.'

A report from Amnesty International last week condemned the
emergency legislation saying it created a 'shadow criminal
justice system' for foreign nationals which permitted indefinite
detention using evidence from foreign intelligence services
extracted under torture.

Matthias Kelly QC, chairman of the Bar Council said: 'I am
completely opposed to the use of internment. If the Government
has the evidence, why does it not have the confidence to put it
up in court?'

Documents seen by The Observer reveal that several of the men
are in prison because they were suspected of fundraising for the
war against Russia in Chechnya. One man was arrested
because he was thought to be 'working to procure items... for
extremists fighting in Chechnya'. These included boots and
sleeping bags.


The document shows that the Home Office believes the
suspects, mostly Algerians, are members of extremist Islamic
groups or associates of individuals connected with terrorism. Six
Algerians are accused of membership of the GIA, the Armed
Islamic Group, which have been blamed for for massacring of
woman and children.

Others are believed to be members of a second Algerian
extremist group, the GSPC, or Salafist Group for Call and
Combat, the Tunisian Fighting Group and Egyptian Islamic
Jihad. Several detainees are said to have recruited for terrorist
training camps in Afghanistan.

guardian.co.uk



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)4/6/2004 12:18:12 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Pentagon report on Afghanistan criticizes war strategy: report

Sun Apr 4, 4:36 PM ET

story.news.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A retired army colonel commissioned by
the Pentagon to examine the war in Afghanistan
concluded the conflict created conditions that have
given "warlordism, banditry and opium production a new lease on life."


Retired Army Colonel Hy Rothstein, who
served in the Army Special Forces for more
than 20 years, wrote in a military analysis he
gave to the Pentagon in January that the US
failed to adapt to new conditions created by
the Taliban's collapse, The New Yorker
magazine reported.

"The failure to adjust US operations in line
with the post-Taliban change in theater
conditions cost the United States some of the
fruits of victory and imposed additional,
avoidable humanitarian and stability costs on
Afghanistan," Rothstein wrote in the report.

"Indeed, the war's inadvertent effects may be
more significant than we think."

The military should have used Special Forces to adapt to new
conditions, Rothstein wrote.

The war "effectively destroyed the Taliban but has been significantly less
successful at being able to achieve the primary policy goal of ensuring
that al Qaeda could no longer operate in Afghanistan," he wrote.

The Pentagon returned the report to Rothstein with a request he cut it
drastically and soften his conclusions, the magazine reported.


"There may be a kernel of truth in there, but our experts found the study
rambling and not terribly informative," Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense Joseph Collins told The New Yorker.



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)4/9/2004 11:06:39 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
Afghan Renegade Continues Advance Despite Talks
Fri Apr 9,

By Sayed Salahuddin

KABUL (Reuters) - An Afghan strongman whose forces have
overrun a northern province issued a stark warning to the U.S.-backed
president on Friday -- fire the defense and interior ministers or your
government will fail.


Even as a delegation led by Deputy Defense
Minister General Mohibullah met General
Abdul Rashid Dostum to urge him to withdraw
his fighters from Faryab province, the militia
advanced further having taken the provincial
capital on Thursday.


Speaking to Reuters for the first time since
his forces attacked Faryab on Wednesday,
Dostum complained he had not been
consulted about the deployment of hundreds
of national army troops to the province to
restore order.

"I will help with the national army and I should
be trusted," he said.

Dostum, who has continued to angle for a top
position despite losing favor since helping
U.S. forces topple the Taliban in 2001, called
on Afghan President Hamid Karzai to sack officials including Defense
Minister Mohammad Qasim Fahim and Interior Minister Ali Ahmad Jalali.

"If he does not, his government will fail," he said.

He said Fahim was only interested in extending his power, while Jalali
had been out of the country working in Washington while Dostum and
others were fighting to overthrow the former Taliban regime.

Dostum, an adviser to Karzai, also complained that U.S. planes hovered
over his house in the town of Shiberghan on Thursday night.

"My kids were frightened, but let me say that I am not the type of man to
be afraid," he said.

Karzai rushed troops to Maimana on Thursday but they arrived too late
to stop the advance of Dostum's forces that forced the governor and
provincial commander Mohammad Hashim Habibi to flee.

While few casualties have been reported, the latest factional unrest is
bound to cause worries in Washington about the stability of Afghanistan
as the country prepares for elections and U.S. troops
pursue Taliban and al Qaeda fighters.

It is an unwelcome headache in President Bush 's own
election year as U.S. forces struggle in Iraq .

TALKS GOING ON


Karzai has ordered the immediate withdrawal of Dostum's fighters from
Faryab, but so far has been ignored.

"Talks are going on and we hope that the issue can be settled without
confrontation," a Defense Ministry spokesman said.

Karzai's spokesman Jawed Ludin confirmed an Afghan Islamic Press
report quoting Habibi as saying that Dostum's forces had continued their
advances on Thursday night and Friday.

He said they captured the district of Belcharagh on Friday morning and
occupied other eastern areas of the province.

"Our forces have retreated, but now fierce fighting is
raging in Gurzawan," Habibi told AIP, adding that
several people had been killed and wounded.

Ludin said 500 troops would be in Maimana by evening
and it was now calm. "It will probably take a bit of time
to bring the wider region under control, but it will be
brought under control," he said.

Ludin said Dostum had contacted Kabul on Thursday
and insisted he was not trying to challenge Karzai's
authority and that he had not sent fighters into Faryab.

Asked what action Karzai would take against Dostum,
Ludin said: "I don't think it's useful to speculate. We're
looking into the factors and we will cross that bridge
when we come to it."

On Thursday, Jalali termed Dostum's moves
"unconstitutional" but the ethnic Uzbek, whose forces
have been involved in several rounds of fighting for
territory since the Taliban fell, has a sufficiently large
powerbase to make him difficult to arrest.

It is the second time in weeks that Karzai has sent
troops from the still infant national army to deal with
unrest involving provincial militias targeted for
disarmament and underlines the problems he faces
keeping to his vow to disarm 40,000 by June.
(Additional reporting by Hanan Habizai in
Mazar-i-Sharif and David Brunnstrom in Kabul)

story.news.yahoo.com



To: Mephisto who wrote (7115)4/10/2004 6:42:06 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 

Afghan Route to Prosperity: Grow Poppies

April 10, 2004
The New York Times
By AMY WALDMAN

HORABAK, Afghanistan - Rahmatullah trudged toward his village with
his donkey, as men across Afghanistan have done for centuries.
But in this century, men in Jeeps and on motorbikes were passing him by.
So this year Rahmatullah, a 37-year-old father of three, speaking in front
of the village mosque and its mullah, said he would join his neighbors
in growing poppies to harvest Afghanistan's most lucrative cash crop, opium.
His hierarchy of dreams is all sketched out. First he will pay off some $1,200 in debt.
Then he will build a house to replace the one room he shares with his family,
then buy cows for plowing.
"Then, if I get richer, I'll buy a car," he finished, eyes agleam.

Across Afghanistan, opium cultivation is surging, defying all efforts
of the Afghan government and international officials to stop it.
Officials are predicting that land under poppy cultivation will rise by
30 percent or more this year, possibly yielding a record crop.
Last year the country produced almost 4,000 tons - three-fourths
of the world's opium - in 28 of its 32 provinces. The trade generated
$1 billion for farmers and $1.3 billion for traffickers, according to the
United Nations, more than half of Afghanistan's national income.
The expansion of the trade presents a gathering threat to the new
democratic government and a severe challenge to the American
and international forces here. But American officials, reluctant
to open a new front in the campaign against terror or engage
in an antidrug war here, are conflicted about how aggressively to combat it.
Zalmay Khalilzad, the American ambassador, said in a recent
interview that with Afghanistan's elections approaching - they
are now scheduled for September - "the politics of it may require
not to go too harsh" with eradication.

But as opium production underpins ever more of Afghanistan's
economic life, from new business growth to home construction,
officials also fear that the economic and political risks of uprooting
it will only increase. To the chagrin of Afghan and international officials,
the narcotics industry has far outpaced the legal reconstruction of Afghanistan,
with a capitalist intensity they would otherwise applaud.


It has lured private capital for investment and created a free-market system.
With Thuraya satellite phones, farmers in distant Kandahar, a rival source
of poppy in the south, know almost in real time about changing weather
conditions here in this northeastern province, Badakshan, and adjust prices accordingly.
Landowners and traffickers offer credit to farmers willing to grow poppy.
Trafficking has linked Afghanistan to the global economy. It even brought
the first real industry here, a heroin processing laboratory that villagers estimated
had operated for six months to a year before it was destroyed by Afghan
and British forces in January. One local referred to it as "the company."
Afghanistan's opium production peaked under the Taliban, who partly
financed their movement from the profits. But in July 2000 the Taliban
banned opium cultivation, to the distress of many farmers, and the price soared.
Many experts say the ban was simply meant to drive the price up, amounting
to an effective cornering of the market for the Taliban and others who had amassed stockpiles.
British and Afghan officials are now counting on mullahs to spread the word that
it is haram, or forbidden, under Islam to cultivate opiates. But interviews in many
villages found that such preachings were ignored. Other mullahs were growing it themselves.
For many Afghans, poppy has allowed for piety. A United Nations report
on Afghanistan's opium economy noted that 85 percent of opium traders
surveyed had performed the hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca that is incumbent
on every Muslim but too costly for most Afghans.

The growth in opium production is among the gravest threats facing
the administration of President Hamid Karzai. It has corrupted
the government from bottom to top, including governors and cabinet officials,
according to senior Afghan and American officials.

American and Afghan officials say opium is financing warlords
like Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, local militias, the Taliban and possibly Al Qaeda.
Even as some American officials remain wary of fighting the spread
of opium too aggressively, others have criticized the British,
who have taken the lead against the drug trade here, for being too soft
and slow on eradicating poppy crops. A British plan in 2002 to compensate
farmers for eradication is widely seen to have acted as a "perverse incentive"
to grow, as one official put it.

Citing the link between narcotics and terrorism, United Nations and
British officials, meanwhile, are urging the American-led military alliance
to take on laboratories and traffickers. The Americans, who will put $73
million toward antidrug operations in Afghanistan this year, say such an
approach will simply send the laboratories over the border to places like
Pakistan's tribal areas, while doing nothing to stop the surge in new cultivation.
But an American official also pointed out that many of those in the drug trade
"are the guys who helped us liberate this place in 2001" from the Taliban
and on whom the American military continues to rely in its hunt for the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
"The military just does not want to go down that road," he said.

Ideally, officials say, eradication efforts would focus on wealthy landowners
growing poppy, not poor farmers. But many struggling farmers
have become sharecroppers on the vast fields of the rich and would
share the punishment, just as they share the profit.

The American forces have so far limited their intervention against traffickers
and laboratories to encounters as they come across them in the
course of other military action.But Lt. Gen. David Barno, the commander
of the American-led forces, said in March that his troops were finding
growing connections between extremism and drugs, which could augur
a more assertive approach to the drug trade.

Afghan commando units, with British support, have recently raided
as many as 30 laboratories in Nangarhar Province, often meeting
well-armed resistance. An American A-10 attack plane shelled
"the company" - the processing laboratory near here - when the British
and Afghan commandos raided that site.
As the effort to treat the laboratories as targets increases,
officials expect violence to rise. American officials say raids on
laboratories have already provoked conflict among drug traffickers
convinced that their competitors informed on them.
Recent fighting in the Argo district prompted the removal of the governor
and police chief after officials in Kabul, the capital, concluded that the
two men were working for rival traffickers.
The opium trade is transforming life in Argo, a remote district in Badakshan
where a cover of green poppies climbs up steep, desolate hills.
The street that runs through the bazaar is mud, but the $200 television
sets in the stalls glitter. In the last four years, said Abdul Rahman,
18, poppy provided his family with a motorbike, a television, an electric generator,
a VCR and a CD player - and a new house to hold it all. Last year his family
accumulated $4,000 in poppy profits.

Badakshan, here in the north, lays bare narcotics' distorting
economic effects. Poppy cultivation has driven up dowry prices
and raised the cost of labor so much that wheat was not harvested last year.
So many people are building new homes and businesses with their
poppy profits that Atiqullah, 23, a mason, said his daily rate had doubled.
Criminal calculation is partly driving the spread of the drug trade.
Residents of Pashtun-inhabited regions long known for poppy growing
have turned into outlaw Johnny Appleseeds, crossing the country
with loans, expertise and seedpods to generate more opium for heroin
laboratories, American and United Nations officials and Afghan farmers say.
But a calculus of human longing is also at work. With the price of opium
stubbornly stuck at more than $135 a pound, no legal crop can compete.

"We see in Daryan" - a district thick with poppy - "other people getting rich,"
said Rahmatullah, who like many Afghans uses one name. "Their life is better.
We want to make our life better too." Today, growing poppies is less
about survival - as it was during a drought in this country - than about
upward mobility. It is about a new consumer class and an even larger
class of aspirants to it."Those who had a donkey have a motorbike,"
said Ahmed Shah, a young farmer in Badakshan. "Those who had a
motorbike have a car. Those who have one wife want a second one."
In Dari, the local language, there is a saying: if your donkey lags behind,
cut his ear off. It reflects, Afghans say, the central role of envy in
their culture - and in cultivation.

The Shomali Plain, just north of Kabul, is full of first-time growers,
many of them mujahedeen soldiers. A young commander, Mayel,
denied that he was growing poppy, then whispered in earshot of a translator
that he was too ashamed to admit that he was.
"We see the people in the south and east getting rich," he told
a confidant with righteous logic. "Why shouldn't we cultivate too?"
nytimes.com

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company