Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (424896)	7/9/2003 5:40:36 PM
From: RJ2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Is'nt that tender!!!

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (424896)	7/9/2003 7:51:13 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I'm more interested in the principle than the issue. In principle, does a local jurisdiction have the right to express the prevailing morality in its laws? I think except for cases explicitly defined in the Constitution ( eg. race ) the community should have wide latitude to proscribe what it wishes. A thin majority on the supreme court thinks THEY should decide - on a case by case basis. Now if you want to add a sexual preference protection to the Constitution, go for it.