Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (25168)	7/9/2003 10:05:20 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

Hawkmoon, Re: Can you give me YOUR name and number?? Yes, via PM when you provide the name and phone # of your purported witness, or you can simply do a white pages search on the Internet. :) Your reply is disingenuous, as usual. For instance, the idea that the Pentagon was struck by something other than the AA77 is a well researched theory and worthy of investigation by the Kean Commission. Of couse, TTBOMK, the Kean Commission has no curiosity whatsoever about this matter. The book by Thierry Messyan and a multiplicity of sites available on the Internet, all conclude that there are vast gaps in the "official story". Kyle Hence is a researcher you may wish to contact. Here's his contact information: Organization: 9/11 CitizensWatch Open Letter July 1, 2003 To: Dr. Phillip Zelikow Executive Director National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States cc: Al Felzenberg, Communications afelzenberg@9-11commission.gov Bill Johnstone, staffmember Dear Dr. Zelikow, Allow me to first say how much I appreciate the spirit in which Chairman Kean is approaching his task within the Commission. Indeed, as he has said, "no stone must be left unturned"; the Commission must for history's sake and for the victims' families sake follow all leads wherever they might lead. I speak for many concerned citizens when I express the hope that genuine accountability and a full accounting will carry the day in the end. After the last round of hearings Chairman Kean was asked by Bob Braun from the Star-Ledger if the Commission had plans to take testimony under oath from witnesses and officials who can resolve discrepencies and conflicts in what has been put forward, for example by the FAA and NORAD regarding the response or lack of response of our air defenses and the actions taken, or not taken by the National leadership on 9/11; many or most of whom had been warned by our intellegence agencies. Chairman Kean in his response, left the issue open and was non-committal. I am writing to ask for an update on the issue of taking testimony under oath: Have you since the last round taken under oath any testimony in private closed-door sessions? Will you be taking testimony under oath in the upcoming July 9th hearing? If not, do you have any intention of requiring testimony under oath from any of the officials who were charged with providing for the common defense leading up to the attacks of 9/11? I look forward to your response to what I feel is a very critical process issue on the road to creating the 'definitive account' of 9/11. Thank you for your attention to my concerns. Sincerely, Kyle F. Hence Co-founder, 911citizenswatch.org kylehence@earthlink.net *********** Re: Hawkmoon: "I will tell you he was quoted in several newspapers around the DC area. Take a look for someone who's account matches the one I told you.." Was he quoted anonymously? If not why can't you provide his name? Are you playing games here? -Ray