Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (104520)	7/10/2003 6:08:33 AM
From: Noel de Leon	Respond to of 281500

Didn't think it was necessary to mention it. Figured that Nadine had a lapse of memory.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (104520)	7/10/2003 8:13:44 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I think denazification was much more lenient in Austria than in Germany. And within Germany, the British and French were more lenient than the Americans and Russians. Under denazification, low-level Nazi party members were individually investigated. If they turned out to have been guilty of nothing more than membership, I think they were given certificates of denazification. Such is my understanding. In Iraq, there is another (ethnic/religious) issue than just Baath party membership, I think. The Baath party and Saddam's government drew most of its support from the Sunni Arab minority - which is the segment producing the violent resistance now. Putting very many former Baath Sunni Arabs back in their positions sends a negative message to the 80% of the country which isn't Sunni and Arab - that they've been betrayed again - and could produce bigger problems than we face now with the Sunni Arabs.