SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (25184)7/10/2003 1:59:22 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
The 757 was seen heading down from Washington past the bridges over the river. No one has claimed to witness the remarkable turn the plane would have had to execute in order to satisfy the both the eye witness accounts and the location that was struck on the building

I get it, can't have a murder if there aren't any witnesses...right...

The best speculation I've seen is that the plane continued at low altitude out to the Bay, while a second craft impacted the Pentagon and completely stole everyone's attention. The classic magician's distraction trick.

Aliens Ray, you forgot the large breasted sex starved aliens who teleported the plane into their holding bay and then removed the people to become sex slaves and then put the plane back, but had the flight path wrong and this accounts for the impossible 270 degree turn (wait, couldn't it just do a 90 degree turn the other way and make it a little less impossible?...nevermind, what was I thinking...)

Wrong kimosabe. I concluded the very first press conference that Ron Dittemore gave that he was blowing smoke about the need for an investigation. He was fully engaged in an unsuccessful CYA effort. The fact of the matter is that they launched in weather that was too cold. (Where have we heard this before?) What struck the leading edge of the shuttle wasn't just foam. It was foam and ice from the condensation that was occurring after the LOX had been loaded on the booster. The foam was aged, the glue holding it on weak and with the stress of the cold weather and the ice buildup, the catastrophe would seem to have been predictable. Again, the necessity of meeting a schedule created a disaster that wouldn't have occurred in July or August.

So,what you are saying is that, given enough velocity and mass, even something that would normally not be able to penetrate the harder reinforced surface could actually pierce the surface? I wonder if the foam that hit the wing vaporized...hmmmm

Have you ever seen those cool water cannons that bomb squads use? Yup, they shoot water at high velocity and it actually pierces solid materials.

I'm addressing your earlier comments about the plane not being able to break through the reinforced pentagon wall.



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (25184)7/10/2003 9:05:21 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
The best speculation I've seen is that the plane continued at low altitude out to the Bay, while a second craft impacted the Pentagon and completely stole everyone's attention. The classic magician's distraction trick.

You've obviously never been to the DC area Raymond.

The "bay" is over 60 miles away towards Annapolis. And I can guarantee you that, since it would have had to fly literally over Andrews AFB enroute, over some of the most populated portions of the region, someone would have seen a low-flying airliner.

Why don't you just shut up about the subject until you collect enough pennies in your piggybank to afford a bus trip out here... Let me know you're coming and I might even be able to arrange a guided tour.

Might even be able to swing a guided tour of the Pentagon for you...

Hawk