Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: T L Comiskey who wrote (21838)	7/11/2003 10:33:56 AM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 89467

Ever since Spitzer's investigation started exhibiting how ineffectual the Federal regulatory system was, I've been expecting some sort jurisdictional change to mask the cozy Federal relationship. From Les nytimes.com lurqer

To: T L Comiskey who wrote (21838)	7/11/2003 11:18:46 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 89467

<<...Mr. Nader hammered away at what he described as corporate greed, unfair treatment of third-party candidates by the Federal Election Commission and the indistinguishable differences between Democrats and Republicans. He also said Mr. Bush was not only "beatable but impeachable," for "deceptions and prevarications" on national security matters, like insisting that Saddam Hussein had ties with Al Qaeda. He chided the Democrats for their unwillingness to stop treating Mr. Bush as "a wartime president," and implored them to attack him on his positions on the environment, corporate malfeasance and "the growing quagmire in Iraq."...>> Message 19101401