Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (5636)	7/11/2003 8:02:03 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Respond to of 15991

Then in that case who was it that took the President hostage and prevented him from carrying out his duties This implies that a) the President was an innocent victim, who deserves none of the blame, and b) that he would have carried out this duty had he been able. In the case of a) there is plenty of blame to go around, and in regards to b) none of the rest of Clinton's very ad-hoc foreign policy gives any evidence of this. This business of taking hostage has got to stop. Such tactics are Hitlerian. Remember Hitler Nadine! Get a grip, Chinu. If you want to help defeat Bush in 2004, resist the wave of hysteria that seems to be sweeping the Democratic base. Hysteria will only convince the swing voters that they remain safer with Bush et al.