Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (21987)	7/11/2003 3:34:23 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Saddam's denials are so credible In 2003, his track record is better than Bush. which have never been accounted for......to this day..... not accounted for does not mean they exist. So far the only WMD we've discovered has been outside of Ft. Dietrick, MD in fact one was launched during the war and flew more than five times further than the allowable range for such weapons per the Gulf War accords..... Five times, simply not true. More like 5 km. They didn't even have the capability of reaching Israel. But none the less. Saddam reported them, they argued over the distance and Iraq agreed to destroy them. There was no concealment of the existance of those missiles. The US has a record of using VX??? Interesting.... You didn't read my post correctly. Mobile biolabs were found exactly as defectors described them Trucks with four wheels...exactly as defectors described them...whoopee. Defectors will tell you anything you want to hear. That's why all this intel has been dead ends. There was no evidence that they were ever a biolab. Even the US kept on tweaking their position. And they certainly didn't match up with the photos that Powell showed the UN. So are you telling me that Powell was showing photos that didn't match up with what the defectors said? That's tacky. I'm referred to Salman Pak where they were training thugs to hijack airplanes armed with knives. Whoopee!!! The Cubans down in Florida do scarier stuff than that. 14 of the hijackers were Saudis; the religious schools in SA do a fine job teaching about Americans. No haven for terorrists.....it supports terror.... I can honestly say I have no idea what you're trying to say. How many of those checks helped incite others to commit more such bombings.....it is supportive of terror.... You're thinking from the perspective of greedy conservatives....money would motivate you and Rush, but these terrorists are religious fanatics. Religious fanatics don't use money as a factor in the decision process. I've never seen an interview with a fundamentalist that said...gee, I'd do a suicide bombing for $10K but without the $10K I'm sticking to basket weaving. There's never been an interview that I've seen with a surviving family of a suicide bomber where the family had any regrets based on lack of money. It's an easier argument that when Israel bulldozes the home of the family of a suicide bomber that incites more terrorism. Since Bush has acknowledged the Niger story was in error...its no longer soemthing to debate..... Depends on what the debate was...you were arguing that the Niger story still could be true. The other issue is what did Bush know and when? There has been no statement out of the White House that Bush did not know that the Niger story was false at the time of the State of the Union. your excuses for a brutal thug are inexcusable.... I've made no excuses for a brutal thug, your statement is patently false. Is that what you have to do....just make up stuff on the fly. Your list is abysmal. jttmab

To: jlallen who wrote (21987)	7/11/2003 5:08:56 PM
From: Steve Dietrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

<<Al-Samouds......Iraq claimed they were not banned becuase the range was too short....in fact one was launched during the war and flew more than five times further than the allowable range for such weapons per the Gulf War accords.....>> Can you reference this? You're the only person i've heard still making his claim. Can you point me to a news source? Thanks, Steve

To: jlallen who wrote (21987)	7/12/2003 4:11:09 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

I'm referred to Salman Pak where they were training thugs to hijack airplanes armed with knives........maybe you ought to try acquainting yourself with the facts..... I took your suggestion.... thedesertsun.com [Army Brig. Gen. Vincent Brooks, at the U.S. Central Command’s ]Brooks said he did not know whether any of the reported foreign fighters were connected to known terrorist organizations. However, he said information gleaned from foreign fighters before the raid left no doubt that the site was used for training terrorists. "The nature of the work being done by some of those people that we captured, their inferences to the type of training they received, all these things give us the impression that there was terrorist training that was conducted at Salman Pak," he said. "We did also find some other things there," he continued. "We found some tanks and destroyed them. We found some armored personnel carriers and destroyed them, in small numbers," he said. " We destroyed some buildings that were used for command and control, and some other buildings that were used for morale and welfare. We destroyed the complex. Pretty rock solid proof! So rock solid the best Brooks can say is he's left with the impression that it was a terrorist training camp. Thanks for suggesting I check the facts. An abysmal list. jttmab