SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (36033)7/12/2003 4:41:15 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
I Think AC returned just because Elmat is here working like crazy on his new project in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia!!!



To: TobagoJack who wrote (36033)7/12/2003 4:43:12 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
By tying their currencies to the dollar, Asian governments are creating global economic strains

Fear of floating

Jul 10th 2003
From The Economist print edition

AP
By tying their currencies to the dollar, Asian governments are creating global economic strains

AFTER sinking since the start of the year, the dollar has come up for air, gaining 4% against the euro in recent weeks. But it is quite likely to plunge again, pulled under by America's huge current-account deficit. So far the dollar's descent has been uneven. It has fallen by around a quarter against the euro since the start of 2002. But it has lost only 10% or less against the yen and many other Asian currencies, and it is unchanged against the Chinese yuan, although most of the Asian economies have large balance-of-payments surpluses.






America's biggest bilateral trade deficit is with China ($103 billion in 2002). Asia as a whole accounts for half of America's total deficit. If these currencies cling to the dollar, then others such as the euro will have to rise disproportionately if America's deficit is to be trimmed.

And cling they do. The Chinese yuan and the Malaysian ringgit are pegged to the dollar and protected by capital controls. The Hong Kong dollar is also tied to the greenback through a currency board. Officially, other Asian currencies float, but central banks have been intervening on a grand scale in the foreign-exchange market to hold down their currencies as the dollar has weakened. The exception is the Indonesian rupiah, which has gained 27% against the dollar in the past 18 months (see chart).

Whereas intervention to support a currency often fails, intervention to push one down can be more effective, because in theory a central bank can print unlimited amounts of its own currency with which to buy dollars. As a result of central banks' heavy buying, Asia's foreign-exchange reserves have swollen from less than $800 billion at the start of 1999 to over $1.5 trillion now, almost two-thirds of the global total. Japan bought over $30 billion-worth in May alone; it now has almost $550 billion in its coffers. The world's seven biggest holders of foreign-exchange reserves are all in Asia (see chart).






The Asian countries' reluctance to allow their currencies to rise against the dollar is coming in for increasing criticism. At a meeting in Bali last weekend of Asian and European finance ministers, the Europeans urged the Asians to let their currencies rise. John Snow, America's treasury secretary, the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements have all called for a stronger yuan.

Asian governments worry that appreciating currencies might hurt their exports. Yet many of their currencies are supercompetitive. As the dollar slides, their trade-weighted values against a basket of currencies is falling. According to The Economist's Big Mac index, China has the most undervalued currency in the world. Using more sophisticated methods, UBS, a Swiss bank, reckons that the yuan is now more than 20% undervalued against the dollar.

UBS reckons that there are two tell-tale signs that a currency is undervalued. The first is rapidly rising official reserves. China, Japan, Taiwan and India have seen the biggest increases in reserves over the past 18 months. On the other hand, in Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines, reserves have been fairly flat.

A second test is the size of a country's basic balance (the sum of its current-account balance and net inflows of long-term capital, such as foreign direct investment). In 2002 China's current-account surplus was 2.2% of GDP; adding in foreign direct investment gave a basic balance of 6% of GDP. This year the current-account surplus has shrunk, but the overall basic balance remains well in surplus.

Asia's artificially cheap currencies
Jul 10th 2003
Japan's economy
Jul 10th 2003
The Big Mac index
Apr 24th 2003

Hong Kong

China, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia

Asian economies

The Central Bank of Malaysia and Hong Kong Monetary Authority have information on their respective currencies. The Bank for International Settlements links to other central banks. See also the IMF's China information.


UBS reckons that all the Asian currencies, except Indonesia's, are undervalued against the dollar on the basis of these two measures. The most undervalued are the yuan, the yen, the Indian rupee and the Taiwan and Singapore dollars; the least undervalued are the ringgit, the Hong Kong dollar and the South Korean won.

In a free market, China's currency would surely rise. But demands from foreigners are likely to fall on deaf ears. The Chinese government is worried about rising unemployment as jobs are lost in unprofitable state companies, and deflation remains an issue. Moreover, until banks are reformed and non-performing loans tackled, it would be dangerous to liberalise the capital account. It would be safer to repeg the yuan at a higher rate. But most economists reckon that, at best, the yuan's band will be widened slightly over the next year, without allowing room for any significant appreciation. And, so long as the yuan is pegged to the dollar, other Asian countries will have a big reason to resist appreciation too.

In the wake of the Asian crisis of 1997, it is understandable that governments like to have bigger reserves to defend their currencies against future attack. But stuffing reserves under the mattress is not without cost. The return on American Treasury bonds is much less than could be had from investing the money more productively at home. Large inflows of foreign exchange can also bring too much liquidity into the economy, which can then cause asset-price bubbles. Asian central banks have tried to “sterilise” their intervention, selling bonds to mop up extra liquidity, but this will become harder as reserves grow.

China is considering various policies to stem the rise in reserves and fend off pressure for a revaluation. One option would be to allow firms to retain more foreign-exchange earnings; at present most have to be sold to the People's Bank of China. Another option is to relax restrictions on residents and firms wanting to buy foreign currency. The government already plans, later this year, to allow Chinese firms to buy foreign bonds. In June, 11 Asian countries set up a $1 billion Asian Bond Fund that will invest in local bonds. The aim is to develop local bond markets and so keep more Asian capital at home rather than see it invested abroad.

Fred Bergsten, of the Institute for International Economics in Washington, DC, criticises Asian countries' exchange-rate policies. He complains that they are not playing their role in the global adjustment process that is needed to reduce America's external deficit. As a result, as the dollar slides, the euro is likely to become seriously overvalued, while Asia's cheap currencies may provoke protectionism.

The complaints from Europe are likely to be louder than those from America. American pressure on China may be limited because the United States needs China's help in resolving tensions with North Korea. Another reason for America to pull its punches is that China and other Asian countries hold their reserves largely in American government securities. If Asians lost their appetite for dollar assets, the greenback would fall even faster, and American bond yields would rise.

Indeed, from this point of view, the Asian economies are supporting America's profligate habits. By buying American government securities they help finance America's large external deficit, hold down interest rates, and so sustain the boom in consumer spending and mortgage borrowing. This may benefit America in the short term, but it allows even bigger imbalances, in the shape of consumer debt and foreign liabilities, to continue to build. The eventual consequences for America—and the world economy—could be more painful.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (36033)7/12/2003 4:44:42 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 74559
 
Asian countries' efforts to hold down their currencies are misguided

Asian currencies

Re-orientation needed

Jul 10th 2003
From The Economist print edition

Asian countries' efforts to hold down their currencies are misguided






DOES somebody in your office not pull their weight, loading the hardest jobs on to others? This breeds resentment—and so it can at the global level. Today's beef is that the burden of the dollar's decline is not being fairly shared. The dollar has fallen by around a quarter against the euro since early 2002; yet it is unchanged against the Chinese yuan, which has a dollar peg, and barely down against other Asian currencies. Asia's shirkers should now let their currencies rise too.

To argue that China ought to revalue does not mean accepting some popular claims, notably that it is to blame for America's huge trade deficit and for exporting deflationary pressures. These claims are nonsense. Imports from China amount to less than 2% of GDP in America and Japan, so they cannot cause deflation. And America's trade deficit is the result of years of excessive consumer spending. It is, however, true that the Chinese yuan and other regional currencies are being deliberately held down. And, at a time when the dollar is falling and America needs to narrow its current-account deficit, Asia's currency rigidity is increasing strains on the world economy. In particular, the euro is having to rise by more than it should, pushing it towards dangerously overvalued levels.

Asian currencies
Jul 10th 2003

China

Asian economies

The Bank for International Settlements links to central banks.


As the dollar has swooned, Asian central banks have been intervening massively to hold down their currencies. As a result, official coffers are bulging with foreign-currency reserves (see article). Mercantilist governments may see this as a sign of strength. In fact excess reserves can point to poor economic management. Reserves are often invested in low-yielding Treasury bills—which is like a firm leaving cash idle in the bank rather than putting it to productive use or returning it to shareholders. Asian countries would benefit if the money were instead invested at home or used to boost consumer spending.

Cheap currencies boost exports, but discourage domestic spending by making imports dearer. Asian economies are more dependent on exports than ever. After the Asian crisis in 1997, super-competitive currencies helped exports to boom, but domestic demand has lagged. So exports now account for an average of 64% of the region's GDP, up from 55% in the early 1990s. Governments fret that stronger currencies would make exports less competitive, but they would also encourage firms to shift upmarket from low-skilled to higher-skilled labour, which is essential for long-term prosperity. Allowing currencies to rise is therefore in many countries' own best interests. There is, admittedly, a specific problem with China: freely floating the yuan would be risky so long as Chinese banks are laden with bad debts and the financial system is fragile. But it would be perfectly possible to re-peg the yuan at a higher parity, keeping capital controls for the time being.

Stronger Asian currencies would take the pressure off the euro and help America's trade deficit to shrink. America's government has urged China and other Asians to stop intervening. Yet, ironically, Asia's massive accumulation of reserves is helping to prop up the American economy. By buying Treasury and government-agency debt, central banks have financed America's current-account deficit, and pushed down bond yields and mortgage rates, allowing America's consumer spending and borrowing binge to continue for longer. This has enabled households to postpone their post-bubble belt-tightening. But because consumer debt and the current-account deficit have swelled further, it means that the eventual adjustment, when it comes, will be more painful.

Perhaps the biggest reason why China and its neighbours should not keep their cheap currencies is that they will stoke protectionist sentiment abroad. As one of the main beneficiaries of freer trade, Asia would be a big loser from that.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (36033)7/12/2003 6:45:54 AM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Respond to of 74559
 
sounds like the devil's stock <g>



To: TobagoJack who wrote (36033)7/13/2003 1:06:37 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net  Respond to of 74559
 
In terms of barrels of proven reserves per stock nothing can beat Russians. Holds for gas producers (Gasprom etc) as well. But, one needs to sit it out.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (36033)7/13/2003 1:09:12 PM
From: Seeker of Truth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Assuredly, as you say, Lukoil (and Gazprom) Luk promISING compared to the effort in the desert. But there is the usual question about shares in legally or economically backward countries, namely why on earth should the controlling stockholders split anything with us? To keep going all they need do is satisfy the bondholders.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (36033)7/13/2003 8:13:20 PM
From: ldo79  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Jay

Best be ready to muster the troops in the morning. I notice the futes are green tonight in anticipation of celebrating this fine news:

Reuters
US May machine tool demand off 36.4 pct from yr ago
Sunday July 13, 5:58 pm ET

"America's investment in modern manufacturing equipment is at one of its lowest points in history," AMT President Albert Moore said in a statement.

biz.yahoo.com

That'll be good for a rally tomorrow. Me, I'll be adding to my URPIX.

Regards,
ldo79