Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (425992)	7/12/2003 11:19:04 AM
From: jimcav	Respond to of 769670

The article was dealing with the interim gov't of Iraq, not military forces. Do you believe that with the UN or NATO involved, the interim gov't would be drastically different? And if so, in what ways would it be better? Seems to me, and maybe I'm missing something, that all groups are fairly well represented. (Not sure how stealing oil came into this) in edit: yes I know the article also mentioned military presence, but the main point behind it was the establishment of a governing body, which is also what your initial response was concerning)