Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (426024)	7/12/2003 3:33:55 PM
From: jimcav	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

There's an RNC attack site? Where would that be? The points I brought up were entirely from Prolifes articles which you summarily discarded, however I had read of them all before. Thanks for finally responding in a way where we can discuss the points without the blind demolib mantra. << 1) Kerry always supported taking out Saddam, but only with a large coalition, the UN and a strong smart pot-war plan. He's been right from the start about all of that.>> But how could he have been right all along, according to you there was no reason to go into Iraq as it was based on lies. If there were legitimate reasons to take out Saddam (I obviously think there were) then why is it all the Dems are harping on how the only justification for the war was based on lies? If Kerry supported the decision to go in (he did) (maybe not how, but the decision to do so) wasn't he wrong if it was based only on lies? Kerry wanted to stop the Viet Nam war. Good for him. Did he not accuse veterans of being war criminals? And the upside down flag portrayal mocking the marines on Iwo Jima? Wanting to stop the war can be seen as noble, were his actions done in a manner that you deem acceptable? I find his methods were very anti-American, disrespectful and certainly not fitting of a President. (Don't talk to me about GW, we're talking Kerry here) The heart-wrenching demonstrations you speak of, obviously didn't affect Kerry the same way--if he truly had the convictions you claim, he would have thrown HIS OWN medals. You say Kerry is his own man now -- so he wasn't before? <<Kerry is moving more to the center now>> A man who blows with the wind, whatever to make him appeal more to those he wants to vote for him. Changing his views is indeed "waffling", he seems to lack his own convictions. You should take a look at him from a different perspective, you're too caught up in it. He is without a doubt liberal, no matter how much you and he and whoever else wants to deny it, his voting record alone speaks of that.