SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lurqer who wrote (21984)7/12/2003 3:51:56 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
LOL!!

lurqer: you have a great sense of humor...we're lucky to have you contribute on this thread.

-s2



To: lurqer who wrote (21984)7/12/2003 4:11:50 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Today, it's like Watergate on amphetamines...

Message 19104904

<<...It is amazing, the parallels here, to Watergate. With each new revelation in Watergate, there was an effort to make someone the fall-guy (after the effort to ignore the charges, and classify all incriminating evidence, had failed). This process worked its way up, slowly, beginning at the very lowest levels (the Watergate burglers), and by successive stages eventually getting to the President.

Today, it's like Watergate on amphetamines, everything moving at internet speed. We have already reached the point where the Vice President's credibility is being questioned. Things that took a year to uncover in the 1970s, take a month now. We are already one step, one small step, from the President. Cheney had to have been given all the data refuting the bogus Chad-uranium claim. There has to be documents proving this; there has to be people (secretaries, staffers, file clerks) who know this, who know which closets the skeletons are in.

And this is only the beginning, only the opening wedge. The bogus Chad-uranium story is only one of many...>>