SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RJ2 who wrote (2818)7/17/2003 8:40:13 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Respond to of 37569
 
It's time Ottawa switched sides

David Warren
CanWest News Service

nationalpost.com

The story is straightforward: Zahra Kazemi, a Canadian photographer of Iranian origin, went home to Iran, took pictures, got arrested, and was beaten to death. So why all the fuss? Iranians get beaten to death every day, and the victims of the regime have included not only talented female photographers, but many of Iran's most gifted writers and artists and thinkers. It is a mere accident that Ms. Kazemi had a Canadian passport, and they had not. Can such a document mean anything?

I wish it did, but it doesn't. As long-time Canadian travellers know, if you get into trouble abroad, you go to the American embassy, or the British, or the Australian, whichever's nearest. The Canadian who uses his own embassy to do anything more than renew his passport, or perhaps collect mail, is inexperienced. He shouldn't be travelling in dangerous places. Unfortunately for Ms. Kazemi, even phoning an embassy wasn't an option.

She knew she was taking risks in documenting Iran's vicious human rights abuses. She decided to take the risks -- for she was a brave and exceptional woman. We do not yet know quite why she was arrested, only that she found herself at the wrong place and time. This in no way justifies what the thugs of the "Islamic Revolutionary" theocracy did to her.

The only question is, what are we going to do about it? Will we make them pay, or will we shrug in the current official manner?

Bill Graham, our really embarrassing Foreign Minister, was reached by phone in Corsica, where he was on vacation, by Canadian reporters. He had spoken to the Iranian Foreign Minister, Kamal Kharrazi, who could give him no hard information whatever but assured him they were investigating.

Typically, Mr. Graham rushed to the defence of the Iranians, remarking they would be wanting to use this case to prove that they don't countenance human rights abuses. It hadn't yet occurred to him to demand Canadian participation in such an investigation. (It was our Deputy Prime Minister, John Manley, who later thought of that, summoning a return "how dare he!" blast from the Iranian Health and Interior Ministers.)

I wrote "typically" because Mr. Graham often makes such remarks, casually defending the honour of various sick, evil regimes, in the name of what is inaccurately called "diplomacy." But the naïveté of such statements goes so far beyond the realm of plausibility as to set off alarms among the sane.

Does Mr. Graham not know what goes on over there? Does he get his news only from the CBC?

Is he not aware that this regime sends scooter brigades of imported Arab and Afghan club-wielding thugs to split the heads of student and all other demonstrators? That Zahra Kazemi's case is not unusual in Iran, except in the one small particular that she happened to be travelling on a Canadian passport? That tales of beatings and untimely deaths in Persian prisons are daily fare? Is it possible a man is the Foreign Minister of a G7 country and doesn't know such things?

I very much doubt the men who tortured and murdered Zahra Kazemi were aware she was carrying a Canadian passport. They probably assumed she was "just another Iranian" from her appearance and facility with the language -- the regime feels fairly free in pummelling its own nameless subjects. Had they spotted the passport -- not that it was Canadian, but that it was a passport -- they might have been content to just smash her camera. How do I know this? Because I'm not naive.

Whereas over Mr. Graham, as over all members of the Canadian foreign service I've encountered, there is a real question. I don't get the impression these people are especially bad; one suspects some may even be well-meaning; they are just vacuously vain and completely uninformed. The instinct among them, to defend -- e.g. the ayatollahs from bad publicity, instead of Canadian citizens from Iranian thugs -- is not founded on anti-Canadian malice, but on some contorted Pavlovian commitment to "world peace."

In this case, Mr. Graham, who doubles as a politician, was caught somewhat by surprise. Only when he gets home will he discover he's a bit out of tune with the electorate on this one; and then the little fellow will start puffing and jumping and fuming against the "lack of co-operation" he will be continuing to receive from the Iranian side. It will be funny to watch, as when your kitten arches up and attacks your ankle.

The very people who hired the thugs to pummel Ms. Kazemi until she was comatose and would die of a brain hemorrhage -- thugs themselves too stupid to check if she was a foreign national first -- are hardly going to prosecute themselves. (The Iranian Vice-President, Mohammad Ali Abtahi, at least had the candour to admit how she died.)

The most we will get from them is a few scapegoats offered up to appease our fury. And that, only after unrelenting pressure from our Foreign Affairs Ministry, or a send-up in the international media (and this story has had no wings beyond our own borders).

What we can do is open our eyes. Canada (as France and several other European countries) has gone to great lengths to maintain good relations with the Iranian theocracy, to advance trade and encourage "dialogue." We have publicly rejected the American confrontationist position. In the name of Zahra Kazemi, it is time to switch sides.

(Ottawa Citizen)

© Copyright 2003 National Post



To: RJ2 who wrote (2818)7/19/2003 9:48:19 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37569
 
ABC reporter target of smear campaign


By SIMON HOUPT
From Saturday's Globe and Mail


New York — A Canadian-born journalist for ABC News is the target of a smear campaign after he broadcast a report about the plummeting morale among U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq.

Internet gossip Matt Drudge told The Washington Post yesterday that he had received a phone call from the White House communications department tipping him to the fact that reporter Jeffrey Kofman is not only gay, but also Canadian. The White House denied making the call.

Under the winking headline "ABC News reporter who filed troop complaint story is Canadian," the Drudge Report Web site provided a link to a profile of Mr. Kofman in The Advocate, a gay-issues magazine.

Mr. Kofman, who is openly gay, filed a report on ABC World News Tonight on Tuesday noting that morale among U.S. troops stationed in Iraq is plunging.

His report from Fallujah included comments from soldiers in the Second Brigade, Third Infantry Division, who are upset about the White House's decision to delay their return to the United States, the third time their return home has been postponed.

One soldier said the changes "pretty much makes me lose faith in the army. I mean, I don't really believe anything they tell me."

Another said, "If Donald Rumsfeld was here, I'd ask him for his resignation," referring to the U.S. Secretary of Defence.

After the report aired, the military said the soldiers who had spoken out would be disciplined.

"None of us that wear this uniform are free to say anything disparaging about the Secretary of Defence or the President of the United States," General John Abizaid, the head of U.S. Central Command, told ABC News.

Reports suggested the six men Mr. Kofman interviewed might face the end of their military careers because of their comments.

The news broadcast and the revelations on the Drudge Report also became fodder for right-wing pundits, who slammed Mr. Kofman as disloyal and untrustworthy because of his sexual orientation and citizenship.

"When you take a job in the United States in the public eye, that goes with the territory," Mr. Kofman said. "I tried to hide the Canadian-ness. I guess the old O-U-T word caught up with me," he joked yesterday from the ABC News bureau in Baghdad, referring to the tell-tale pronunciation of words such as "about" that often give away Canadians in the United States, not the fact that he is out as a gay man.

"My darkest secret has been revealed," he said, chuckling.

Mr. Kofman said he was willing to believe the White House's denial of involvement in the incident. "I'm going to take the White House at face value and accept the comments that they made, which is that this is the first that they've heard of it and if it did happen then it was totally inappropriate."

He added that he doesn't worry about being suspected as disloyal because he's Canadian. "I think people look at all the Canadians at the three networks and scratch their heads at times and say, 'What is it about you Canadians?' " he said. "I think what it is, is that the CBC is a terrific news organization, and we all got terrific training, so we had this incredible leg up."

Mr. Kofman worked at the CBC for 11 years before moving to CBS News in 1997 and then ABC. Like other U.S. networks, ABC has employed many Canadian journalists, including Gillian Findlay and its star anchorman, Peter Jennings.

Despite announcing this month that he had taken U.S. citizenship, Mr. Jennings is still criticized in some quarters as disloyal, particularly after the terrorist attacks of September, 2001, made Americans more sensitive to criticism.

"It's not a journalist's responsibility to be patriotic," said Joe Angotti, chairman of the broadcast department at the Medill School of Journalism in Chicago. "Somehow things in this country have gotten all turned around, where we're at the point that if a journalist asks tough questions, he's considered to be unpatriotic or disloyal. It's a dangerous trend."

ABC News stood by Mr. Kofman's report.

"Jeffrey is an excellent reporter and has done great work for us in Baghdad," spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. "It's unfortunate that when people feel wounded by a truthful report they attempt to shoot the messenger."

Mr. Kofman is one of the best-known, openly gay journalists in the United States. His partner of 17 years is the Canadian opera and theatre designer Michael Levine.

When Mr. Kofman was hired by CBS News, he pushed for the network to grant full benefits to the partners of homosexual staff. Though he says he has never felt under attack because of his sexual orientation, some fundamentalist religious advocates have criticized him and his membership in the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association.

theglobeandmail.com