SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcos who wrote (105112)7/13/2003 3:22:49 PM
From: Sig  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I looked up a URL on Liberia. Can sum it up in one word, prim-at-tive.
No AM radio stations, 2 airports with paved runways, parts of rail lines sold for scrap.
.http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/li.html
Seems there are far more reasons to go there than stay away. Gives us a position to monitor which other country in the area may become a terrorist hideaway (money would speak loudly there).
It is in the US tradition and image to try to support impoverished or desperate people.
Not much hazard as a trap, with Taylor gone the country is practically leaderless, so no commitments needed except what the US promises to try to do.
Might be good to go as part of a UN team, show we can play as a team player
Time will tell
Regards
Sig.@learninggeography.com .



To: marcos who wrote (105112)7/13/2003 6:29:26 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Cote d'Ivoire and Liberia are failed states that are a stone's throw from the Gulf of Guinea's allegedly enormous oil reserves controlled, on the whole, by Nigeria. Tiny Sao Tome has struck a deal with the Nigerians to develop and receive 40% of the earnings from offshore reserves.

An African Brunei in the making? Perhaps so.

gasandoil.com

worldatlas.com

US spreading its influence in the area? Definitely.

news.bbc.co.uk

The paranoia has begun.

obv.org.uk