Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (105125)	7/13/2003 3:53:21 PM
From: Sig	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

<<Sig. Get over it. There are no WMD and WMD had very little if anything to do with the invasion of Iraq.>> I dont have a problem, am rather enjoying the whole debate. The "imminant" threat doesn't even bother me. Whatever will make the US safer for my great-grandkids is OK by me. Actually, whatever makes the world safer. My two boys travel on business to Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Singapore, Holland, and sometimes even Florida. If Saddams demise is an example of what happens to any country that even thinks of developing and using WMD's in defiance of an organization like the UN, or in defiance of a coalition of the willing which consisted of up to 50 nations .who supported our actions in Iraq in one way or another, it should be a deterant to other nations planning to develop WMD's in secret. Sig@timetomoveon.com Wouldn't it be smasher if the the next election came down to a race between Jeb Bush and Hillary C, with all the mud wasted on the wrong targets? (g).