Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (105138)	7/14/2003 12:22:47 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 281500

CNN POLL SHOWING THAT NOBODY BELIEVED TENET. (Captured at 9:19 AM PDT Saturday morning). Whom do you blame for the mistake in the president's State of the Union address on Iraq? President Bush 93% 16533 votes British intelligence 2% 268 votes CIA 5% 948 votes Total: 17749 votes Captured by: whatreallyhappened.com [Scroll down to see results.]

To: Rascal who wrote (105138)	7/15/2003 9:38:22 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 281500

A Quilt of Misinformation? Letter to the Editor The Washington Post Tuesday, July 15, 2003 washingtonpost.com CIA Director George J. Tenet's mea culpa does not entirely account for the burgeoning "yellowcake" scandal ["Bush, Rice Blame CIA for Iraq Error," front page, July 12]. If the CIA had warned the administration that the intelligence was questionable and had kept it out of the president's Oct. 7 speech in Cincinnati, how, then, did this intelligence become credible in time for President Bush's Jan. 28 State of the Union address, and who within the administration pushed for its use? More important, this controversy fits into what appears to be a quilt of misinformation sewn by the Bush administration. In the same State of the Union speech, Mr. Bush told the nation that Saddam Hussein was aiding and protecting al Qaeda, an assertion that has never been proven. He also said that Iraq was "assembling" weapons and, as such, posed "a serious and mounting threat to our country," echoing an earlier statement by Vice President Cheney that "time is not on our side." Now Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld says that the administration had no "dramatic new evidence" of the development of weapons of mass destruction. In March, a week after the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that the Niger documents were forgeries, Vice President Cheney claimed that Iraq had "reconstituted nuclear weapons." Further, a year prior to Mr. Cheney's assertion, Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson concluded that it was highly unlikely that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Niger -- much less procured it. As U.S. soldiers die in Iraq, President Bush needs to account for his administration's misstatements, be they errors or lies. MICHAEL HINDS Chicago