Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (22114)	7/13/2003 8:53:03 PM
From: elpolvo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

x- if you click on the related link to another story about the same thing you can also read this: The magazine also mentioned that the list was prefaced by this puzzling passage: ''This is a list of the henchmen of the regime. Our hands will reach them sooner or later. Woe unto them.'' Since the list was published in a newspaper run by Saddam Hussein's son, it was not clear why this passage would have been allowed to appear. the whole story is puzzling to me and certainly doesn't bring me to any conclusion close to the judge's statement: "That is the story of the ''Honor Roll of 600,'' and why I believe that President Bush was right when he alleged that Saddam was in cahoots with Osama and was coordinating activities with him. It does not prove that they engaged together in any particular act of terror against the United States. But it seems to me to be strong proof that the two were in contact and conspiring to perform terrorist acts. huh? how so judge? -elpolvo