SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (3382)7/14/2003 5:23:06 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793575
 
Notice the whining by the writer about the fact that successful people are giving the 2K donations to the Republicans. And all the poor Dems have is the Unions, the Lawyers, and the Fat Cats. Boo Hoo!

Bush 'Bundlers' Take Fundraising to New Level

By Thomas B. Edsall and Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, July 14, 2003; Page A01

As chairman, president and chief executive of Safeway Inc., the world's 11th-largest grocery chain, Steven Burd is the nexus of a wide network of subordinates and suppliers, as well as friends in corporate suites. And that is why he will play a critical role in President Bush's effort to raise the largest amount of money ever spent on a presidential campaign -- not by giving a lot of money himself, but by finding a lot of people to give relatively little.

In the jargon of political fundraising, Burd is a bundler.

At two Bush fundraising events in California last month, Burd filled 10 tables with Safeway suppliers, including rice farmers, strawberry growers and a cheese manufacturer, plus representatives of Breyers ice cream, Sunkist produce and Del Monte canned goods who paid $2,000 to hear Bush talk. Each donor wrote a four-digit "solicitor tracking code" assigned to Burd on his check so that the Safeway CEO will receive credit from Bush campaign officials and they can keep a running tally of his efforts. The possible rewards, depending on how much money he can bring in, include cocktails with campaign architect Karl Rove, dinner with Commerce Secretary Donald L. Evans and photo opportunities and sessions with the president.

Bush did not invent bundling, an old practice in fundraising designed to give a collection of small donors more bang for their buck by combining their efforts. But the Bush campaign has refined it and made it the central focus of its money strategy because of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law and its goal of reducing the role of mega-donors in political campaigns.

Under the law, large "soft money" contributions from corporations, unions and individuals are banned and the limit on legal "hard money" contributions from individuals to candidates was raised from $1,000 to $2,000 -- rules that at least initially were thought to have leveled the playing field for traditionally outspent Democrats. But the quick success and ambitious goals of Bush's fundraisers, who have said they want to raise $170 million but expect to easily surpass that, show the law can work to the decisive advantage of the Republican Party. The GOP can solicit a greater number of $2,000 donations as a result of wide support in a corporate community eager to repay the Bush administration for its pro-business policies. Democrats, in contrast, have depended on trial lawyers and wealthy liberals who do not have large constituencies to draw on.

Bush campaign officials have tried to play down the role of $2,000 donors and the network of affluent fundraisers backing the president. In interviews, the officials stress that the Republican Party has added more than 800,000 small direct-mail donors over the past 30 months. In fact, however, donors who give the maximum or close to it and the people who solicit them have provided the bulk of the money for Bush's campaigns.

Internal campaign documents show that the bundling organization is dominated by corporate CEOs, lobbyists, energy company executives, venture capitalists and investment bankers who can reach tens of thousands of subordinates, customers and subcontractors. The biggest source of new bundlers has been the universe of doctors, corporate defense lawyers and others who favor the Bush administration's proposal to limit lawsuits and to limit the amount that can be recovered for medical malpractice -- legislation that is part of the broad Republican effort known as tort reform.

In New York, the campaign can draw on the chairmen and chief executives of Merrill Lynch and Co., Bear Stearns Cos. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. In Georgia, top executives at Coca-Cola Co., the Southern Co. and AFLAC insurance are on board. In Florida, sugar barons, real estate developers and the chairman of Wackenhut Corrections Corp., a major federal and state prison contractor, have all joined the Bush bandwagon. And in Washington, the elite of the Republican lobbying community, 116 strong, signed up to raise a minimum of $20,000 each to help win four more years for Bush.

Becoming part of the Bush money machine starts with a pledge card and a commitment to raise a specific amount, from $20,000 to $250,000 or more. A highly successful innovation of Bush's first campaign, which raised a record $101 million, was the designation of "Pioneer" for someone who raised at least $100,000. That designation is also available this campaign, with the promise -- in writing -- of benefits that include "a special Pioneer event with the President," special events at the Republican National Convention in New York and "regular reports" from top campaign officials. But becoming a Pioneer will be tougher.

Last time, Pioneers were given credit for checks collected by people they recruited. Aspiring Pioneers this time around receive credit only for the checks they personally collect. The credit system has touched off fierce jockeying for the contributions of well-known Republicans. Longtime party strategist Rich Galen said that before last month's Bush reception in Washington, he was inundated with requests from Bush fundraisers to write their number on his check.

"I hadn't heard from some of these people in years," he said. Galen chose the number of one longtime friend for his own check, and the number of a second friend for the check written by his wife.

In addition, Pioneer will no longer be the top designation. Those who produce at least $200,000 will be awarded the status of "Ranger," evocative of the Texas Rangers, the baseball team Bush once owned.

The Rangers and Pioneers recruit other Bush supporters as vice chairs, sponsors and host committee members for specific events. These people raise smaller amounts, perhaps $20,000 or $50,000, depending on the event. At the base of the pyramid are the people who write the checks, usually at the behest of an aspiring Ranger or Pioneer.

In an indication of how Bush's network has grown, 17 people signed up to raise $200,000 each as "general chairs" for his June 23 cocktail party at a Manhattan hotel. That amount qualifies each of them as a Ranger. Nine of those prospective Rangers represent new blood for the Bush campaign. The other eight were Pioneers in 2000 and have doubled their commitment from $100,000 to $200,000.

In the 2000 campaign, nearly 60 percent of the money Bush received was in $1,000 donations, the maximum allowed then. He received 59,279 $1,000 donations, or $59.3 million of his $101 million total. The 59,279 donors more than tripled the number of any competitor, according to the Campaign Finance Institute, which is affiliated with George Washington University. Al Gore, who was second in the competition for $1,000 donors, had only 19,298 when running as a sitting vice president. The crucial importance of drawing on a network of colleagues or subordinates was also apparent in that campaign.

Charles M. Cawley, CEO of MBNA, the world's largest independent credit card issuer, for example, was a Bush Pioneer. MBNA employees gave Bush a total of $240,675, according to an analysis by the nonprofit Center for Responsive Politics. Similarly, members of Vinson & Elkins -- the law firm of Pioneer Joe B. Allen -- gave $202,850. Les Brorsen, another Pioneer, is chief lobbyist for Ernst & Young, where employees gave Bush $179,949.

Rove, who remains on the White House payroll for the campaign and has been an energetic promoter of Bush's fundraising events, helped recruit bundlers by holding "pre-sale events" in New York, California and Texas. Before Bush's reception in Los Angeles, Rove chatted up bundlers during a dinner at the ranch of David H. Murdock, the billionaire chairman of Dole Food Co. Attendees said Rove went from table to table, asking for ideas and sharing insights about Bush behind the scenes, then spoke to the group about the campaign's political plans.

The mechanics of the money collection are being run by one of Bush's most loyal political aides, Jack Oliver, who is deputy finance chairman of Bush-Cheney '04 Inc. and who was the chief fundraiser of Bush's last campaign. In between, Oliver stayed in touch with donors as deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Oliver and the Bush campaign have tapped into existing money organizations created by past and present Republican governors, including Bush's brother Jeb Bush in Florida, George E. Pataki in New York, Ohio's Bob Taft, and former California governor Pete Wilson.

The single factor virtually all such donors have in common is that they, their clients, their corporations, their suppliers and their subcontractors are major beneficiaries of the Bush administration's tax-cutting and deregulatory policies.

Almost all of the top Bush fundraisers are in the top 1 percent of the nation's incomes, and many are in the top one-tenth of the top 1 percent. Consequently, they are among those who benefit the most from administration legislation reducing the top income tax rate, the capital gains rate and the elimination of taxation on dividend income.

For instance, four of the chairs for the $2,000-a-person cocktail party in New York were E. Stanley O'Neal, chairman and CEO of Merrill Lynch; James E. Cayne, chairman and CEO of Bear Stearns; Henry A. McKinnell Jr., chairman and CEO of Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drug company; and Henry M. Paulson, chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs. McKinnell, O'Neal and Paulson committed to raising $200,000 each, and Cayne agreed to raise $100,000.

Looking at salaries and bonuses in 2002 ranging from McKinnell's $5.3 million to Cayne's $10.2 million, Citizens for Tax Justice estimated their 2003 tax savings resulting from Bush-sponsored tax cuts will range from $300,000 to $610,000, and become significantly higher as the decade progresses, particularly if their pay packages grow.

In some instances, the bundlers' employers have also benefited from White House policies. Take Dwight H. Evans, who was on the host committee for a June 20 Bush fundraiser at the Ritz-Carlton Lodge at Reynolds Plantation in Greensboro, Ga. Evans is the executive vice president and president of the external affairs group for the Southern Co., which describes itself as "a super-regional energy company." Southern's holdings include five electric utilities: Alabama Power, Georgia Power, Gulf Power, Mississippi Power and Savannah Electric. Evans's responsibilities include directing environmental policy, regulatory affairs and legislative affairs.

Few companies have done as well during the current Bush administration as the Southern Co. The Environmental Protection Agency has curtailed tough regulatory requirements governing improvements at old power plants, and the electricity industry strongly supports the administration's Clear Skies Initiative to change the pollution reduction goals in the Clean Air Act. The administration backs a wide range of subsidies and insurance protections for nuclear energy producers.
washingtonpost.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (3382)7/14/2003 10:48:01 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793575
 
Romensco has the word out that Keller will be named as Editor of the Times today. Here is what a "New York Metro" survey says needs to be done.

The Big Question
Times for a Change
If you were made editor, what would you do first?

By Jada Yuan

Keith J. Kelly, media writer, New York Post: "Get rid of the other Rick Braggs and go back to people who wear out shoe leather. Howell Raines seemed to think that anybody who spent a few months at a dot-com was on the cutting edge."

Mort Zuckerman, owner, Daily News: "Change the corrections policy, no correction longer than 500 words."

David Pecker, CEO, American Media, Inc.: "The op-ed page should include a gossip column."

Howard Kurtz, media columnist, Washington Post: "A charm offensive would be nice. Nothing radical, like dropping the use of Mr. Maybe the new editor can steal a page from W. and give all the reporters nicknames."

Andrew Sullivan, blogger par excellence: "Hire a real conservative columnist."

Ann Coulter, pundit: "Offer a daily version in the original French."

Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor, The Nation: "Hire an ombudsman. True, Bill Keller is opposed to one, but I bet, as someone who received a Pulitzer for his Moscow coverage, he knows it's high time for some perestroika on 43rd Street."

Michael Musto, columnist, The Village Voice: "Change that commercial already. That woman's never going to finish the crossword puzzle!"



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (3382)7/14/2003 11:57:04 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793575
 
New York Times Names Keller to Be Executive Editor
By JACQUES STEINBERG - NEW YORK TIMES

Bill Keller, a columnist for The New York Times who previously served as the newspaper's managing editor and foreign editor and as its bureau chief in Moscow and Johannesburg, has been chosen as its executive editor.

Mr. Keller's appointment to the highest-ranking position in the newsroom, which is effective July 30, was announced today by Arthur Sulzberger Jr., publisher of The Times and chairman of The New York Times Company.

Mr. Keller, 54, succeeds Joseph Lelyveld, who had retired as executive editor in September 2001 but who had agreed to to step back into that role on a short-term basis beginning on June 5. Mr. Lelyveld returned at the publisher's request on the day that Howell Raines, 60, resigned after 21 months in the position.

Mr. Raines's departure, along with that of the paper's managing editor, Gerald Boyd, capped a tumultuous five weeks at The Times that began with a reporter's resignation over allegations he had fabricated and copied from other news sources much of an article that The Times had published on April 26 about the family of a soldier then missing in Iraq.

After a team of Times journalists found that the reporter, Jayson Blair, had engaged in similar journalistic fraud on at least 35 other occasions since last October, other reporters and editors came forward to describe to Mr. Sulzberger (and to other publications) their discontent with Mr. Raines's management style ? a style that was so hard-charged, they said, that it had helped foster the atmosphere that allowed Mr. Blair to flourish.

In a statement today, Mr. Keller, who won a Pulitzer Prize in 1989 for his coverage of the Soviet Union, said, "I'm honored and exhilarated by the opportunity to lead the finest assembly of journalists in the world."

He added: "This news organization is a national treasure. I will do everything in my power to uphold its high standards, preserve its integrity and build on its achievements."

No immediate replacement for Mr. Boyd was named. But Mr. Keller said that in the next few weeks he would evaluate the organization of the newsroom's top management and name additional members of his team.

Mr. Sulzberger described Mr. Keller as "a talented journalist, an accomplished manager and a trusted leader."

In announcing Mr. Raines's appointment as executive editor on May 21, 2001, Mr. Sulzberger had also singled out Mr. Keller, who had been appointed managing editor, the No. 2 executive on the paper's 1,200-member newsroom staff, in 1997 and who had been a candidate to succeed Mr. Lelyveld. Mr. Keller, who joined the newspaper as a correspondent in its Washington bureau in 1984, was a correspondent in Moscow from 1986 to 1991, becoming the newspaper's bureau chief there in 1989. He then worked as bureau chief in South Africa from 1992 to 1995 when Mr. Lelyveld appointed him foreign editor.

"When Bill was reporting out of Moscow and Johannesburg, he was called the `the state of the art' journalist," Mr. Sulzberger told the newsroom staff the day he announced his pick of Mr. Raines. "And indeed he was. He has shown the same flair and skills as foreign editor and managing editor."

Mr. Keller subsequently took an office that fall on the 10th floor of the paper's West 43d Street headquarters ? the offices of its editorial page ? and assumed a dual role, as a columnist whose work appeared on alternate Saturday's on the Op-Ed page and as a senior writer for The New York Times Magazine.

In winning the Pulitzer Prize for international reporting in 1989 ? a prize he co-won with reporters from The Washington Post and Philadelphia Inquirer ? Mr. Keller was honored for his "resourceful and detailed coverage of events in the U.S.S.R.," which included his extensive reporting on an earthquake in Armenia that killed tens of thousands.

Philip Taubman, Mr. Keller's predecessor as Moscow bureau chief, later wrote in the paper's in-house magazine, Times Talk, that "Bill's journey across a devastated Armenia" had resulted in "some of the finest reportage The Times has ever published."

In that same article, Mr. Taubman sought to give a sense of Mr. Keller's management style. He told of how Mr. Keller had turned over the bureau's bookkeeping "to Oleg, the bureau's Russian driver," in part so he could have more time for reporting and writing but also because "while Oleg hated to change the oil, he had a knack for finances."

"The idea was quintessential Keller," Mr. Taubman wrote, "unconventional, even a bit reckless, but inspired."

Mr. Taubman also wrote: "Bill can seem remote at times, but he has a puckish streak that usually rescues conversations from awkwardness."

Mr. Keller's soft-spoken public bearing stands in contrast to the public persona of Mr. Raines.

At a meeting with several hundred of the paper's editors and reporters on May 14, three days after The Times published a report that detailed Mr. Blair's deceptions, Mr. Raines acknowledged that many at the paper "view me as inaccessible and arrogant."

While Mr. Raines pledged to change, his tenure was further upended by the fallout from an editors' note that The Times published on May 23. In that note, the paper acknowledged that Rick Bragg, a prominent national reporter who was close to Mr. Raines, had relied heavily on the reporting of a freelance journalist for an article about the oystermen of Apalachicola, Fla., which Mr. Bragg had visited only briefly. On May 28, he resigned.

A week later, Mr. Raines and Mr. Boyd followed suit.

In the wake of the Blair affair, a committee of Times staff members and three prominent outside journalists is investigating newsroom practices and policies and is expected to report its findings to the publisher later this month.

Other than Mr. Lelyveld and Mr. Raines, only four other people ? Turner Catledge, James B. Reston, A.M. Rosenthal and Max Frankel ? have held the executive editor's position since it was created in 1964.

Before joining The Times, Mr. Keller worked as a reporter for The Dallas Times Herald, The Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report and The Oregonian in Portland. He received a bachelor's degree from Pomona College in 1970 (he is a trustee of the college) and completed the Advanced Management Program at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 2000.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (3382)7/14/2003 3:12:11 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793575
 
Krutz's initial story in the WP was "blah," but he did the same comment on their retraction today that Mnookin does here. First main media comment on Raines and Charlie

>>>>>Keller's appointment comes three days after Raines gave an hour-long interview to Charlie Rose. Times executives, editors and reporters were all upset by Raines's interview, which seemed to many to be an attempt to have his say before a replacement was named. In the interview, in which Raines said he hoped to follow the model of William Butler Yeats and Pablo Picasso as an artist with an "incredible burst of creativity after the age of 60," Raines cast himself as a "change agent" sent to change a "lethargic culture of complacency" at the paper. He described the paper under his leadership as being embroiled in a kind of civil war, with Raines and a small cadre of adherents wanting to make the paper better and many of the paper's editors and reporters resisting change because it would require more work.

The Charlie Rose interview caused some of Raines's remaining supporters at the paper to distance themselves from his comments.
Both Keller and Sulzberger seemed to allude to Raines's interview when they spoke to the newsroom this morning. Keller told his staff to savor life, adding, "That will enrich your work as much as a competitive pulse rate will."
Sulzberger was even more explicit. In the Rose interview, Raines described himself as a "dear friend" of the publisher, and said Sulzberger had chosen him to shake up the staff. On Monday, Sulzberger told the newsroom, "There's no complacency here. Never has been. Never will be."
Meanwhile, Monday's Times contains an unusual corrective article that shows the continuing effect the Blair imbroglio is having on the Times's news hole. Monday's story, titled "Music Executive Still Controls TVT Records," ran on the front of the paper's business section; the piece details how the entire premise of a piece that ran last Monday, written by Lynette Holloway, was incorrect. In addition, the Times ran a more traditional correction on the second page of its front section. Holloway's piece is not the first story a reporter has written an article where inaccuracies undermine the very premise of the story, but it is one of the rare instances where the paper corrected the story with a new article.
msnbc.com