Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (19217)	7/14/2003 3:11:44 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21614

<i.National Restaurant's Office, I think. Sounds good to me. I'm not sure whether I'm supposed to know what those acronyms mean or not at this point. :-) I would flush that one. They've made peace (sort of) with Israel. They may not want to disturb it. But that hardly proves the allegation is true. More speculation. I would flush that one also. There's no historical support for anything other than full support for Israel in the last 50+ years. Flush. Uh, '73 war. That was the one where Nixon ordered an emergency resupply of the Israeli armed forces in the middle of the war. But we were also helping the Egyptians. Right. Looked at your links...too convoluted...flush. Which part of which one? And I don't have any serious disagreement with that as a plausible theory. I may not agree with that policy decision, but it is a plausible theory. That makes sense. That and the domestic issue of not pissing off the Jewish Lobby and losing elections because of that.