SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (105355)7/14/2003 8:41:20 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
If Britain won't reveal its "information", it is probably as bad as the Niger forgeries. Once a lie is told, there is a strong incentive to keep on telling new lies to protect the old lies from being revealed: nytimes.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (105355)7/14/2003 9:29:58 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
If you begin with the assumption that the U.S. and British governments are being honest, yes, you could conclude that. Unfortunately, in the 96% of the world that are not U.S. citizens, Bin Laden is more respected than Bush, and makes no such assumptions.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News