Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (158552)	7/15/2003 11:20:37 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

You think every infant would be abused if they are not paid a visit by some state worker ? absolutely nothing i said can be remotely construed as meaning that. you have serious paradigm paralysis and can't think your way out of it. You think any/every child abuse case would be prevented if only every infant would be paid a visit by some state worker ? same comment as above. hmm... there must be zero child abuse in Vermont !? same as above. now for reality. child abuse dropped 70% in vermont after the program was initiated. you would deny the program and that 70% drop would translate into a 130% INCREASE in child abuse that you obviously SUPPORT b/c you'd withhold the thing that prevented that increase from the kids. you'd be crying like a little baby when one of these child abuse kids robbed you though... then you'd want govt intervention... -lol-