SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (105528)7/16/2003 12:14:21 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Neocon; Re: "Clearly, Blix thought ..."

Obviously you didn't find a single quote from Blix saying what he thought, so imaginative liar that you are, you put some convenient thoughts into his head, LOL.

Go back and look again, liar. Find a quote where Blix says "I think Iraq is hiding WMDs".

Re: "Many of the chemical suits were not in storage, but available for immediate use, ..."

So? The US military keeps chemical suits available for immediate use. So does every other military on the planet, that has concerns about being attacked with chemical weapons.

For that matter, chemical weapons can be (and frequently have been) used without any defenses on the part of the side using them. It's fairly simple. You lob the stuff over to where the other guy is, rather than where your guys are, LOL.

The constant repetition of this sorry logic is an indication of how bankrupt your proof is. But the crowning glory is the absence of any WMDs found in Iraq.

Think about it. We found plenty of chemical weapons defenses, but no chemical weapons, LOL. If chemical weapon defenses were proof of chemical weapons, why didn't the f'ing Iraqis ship all that "proof" up to Syria???

No, what's going on here is that you simply will not accept any other answer to the question "did Iraq have WMDs in early 2003", than yes. So you (and your many, many, many buddies), conflate every item you can find into a big deal.

-- Carl