Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (105576)	7/15/2003 2:33:47 PM
From: GST	Respond to of 281500

I am glad to see you have a sense of humor. Bush and Cheney would never dream of taking Iraq's oil without leaving a few dollars behind in Iraq -- lets see, how to spend those dollars. I know -- contracts for our friends at Halliburton!

To: Bill who wrote (105576)	7/15/2003 2:45:41 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Bill: every decision about Iraq's oil, is currently being made by Americans. The contracts are, almost all, going to Americans. American soldiers occupy and attempt to defend, the oil fields. Future oil sales are used as collateral, to raise money, money that will be controlled by the American Army of Occupation in our new colony of Mesopotamia. That's reality, and, more importantly, that's the way Iraqis see it. Which is why they are sabotaging oil installations. If they thought we weren't stealing it, they wouldn't be blowing up pumping stations. The only way to convince the Iraqis we aren't stealing their oil, is if our soldiers aren't garrisoning their oil fields.