Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (427389)	7/15/2003 5:15:09 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I wondered whether you would try to refute a single thing I posted. You didn't, just fell back on the old liberal ad hominem. Points for predictability! Do you know why I didn't bother to refute a single thing you posted because it would have been too ridiculous. For an example, a communist sympathizer back then did not mean someone who supported Stalin or the USSR but instead they supported the concept of communism which is not what they had in the USSR. But to start such a discussion would be too difficult because like many who are misinformed, you probably believe that the ole USSR was the very epitomy of communism when, in reality, there was very little similarity between what was practiced in Russia and what Karl Marx proposed. So its easier to fall back on liberal ad hominems rather then get into a lengthy discourse that leads no where.

To: Bill who wrote (427389)	7/15/2003 5:16:21 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 769667

I wondered whether you would try to refute a single thing I posted. You didn't, just fell back on the old liberal ad hominem. Points for predictability! Do you know why I didn't bother to refute a single thing you posted because it would have been too ridiculous. For an example, a communist sympathizer back then did not mean someone who supported Stalin or the USSR but instead they supported the concept of communism which is not what they had in the USSR. But to start such a discussion would be too difficult because like many who are misinformed, you probably believe that the ole USSR was the very epitome of communism when, in reality, there was very little similarity between what was practiced in Russia and what Karl Marx proposed. So its easier to fall back on a "liberal ad hominem" as you put it rather then get into a lengthy discourse that leads no where.