Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (1120)	7/15/2003 7:50:06 PM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

You say you don't accept what I saw on a documentary because you don't want to believe it. You are welcome to impose that comfortable, self-satisfying explanation, but in fact, I have offered you the opportunity to document it. Message 19106522 Would I have offered that opportunity if I "didn't want to believe it"? In fact, I'm ready to believe anything verifiable. What I am not ready to do is accept, unquestioningly, the wanton assertions of a message board pundit. You are welcome - indeed, encouraged - to harbor as high an opinion as you ordain for the quality and amount of television programming you absorb, but save your tears if I - a reader, all my life, and not at all inclined toward the tube - want a bit more by way of evidence. If that offends you, well, I'm not sorry, but by now you know how you can redeem yourself. Does it not fit your world view? Any 'world view' I've got is shaped by that which I see and experience, and not by that which is asserted, bereft of supporting information - in particular, from a second through 'nth' point of view. Much, it appears, to your annoyance. Why is that? I can't do any more to prove it to you because I can't show you the video, and you don't believe me. You might want to sharpen up before you leap, cartwheeling and pitiful, to such laughable conclusions. Any source of proof - such as I said in the first post (review if necessary) - will do. In particular, links to credible, reputable sources, etc., corroborating your claims. So, end of discussion. And that, satisfyingly, is the ultimate reply to this post: Message 19106522 Skepticism, quo erat demonstratum. It's a pleasure. :-) LPS5