SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (105666)7/15/2003 9:33:53 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Ish, what happened in the 16th century and 1980 is of little relevance. Maybe you didn't know that Iraq was building a nuclear reactor in 1981 which Israel bombed. Maybe you didn't know that nuclear reactors can use uranium [of the right isotope] as fuel.

That has nothing to do with an invasion in 2003 over weapons of mass destruction and illegal BigFoot fast breeding programmes.

Or were you being dishonest to try to make a case? Everyone knows Saddam wanted to rule the world. Everyone knows he wanted a nuclear reactor and nuclear weapons. Everyone knows he had gas when he attacked Iran at the behest of the USA in revenge for the Ayatollah's coup and hostage-taking of a bunch of Americans when Jimmy Carter was president of the USA umpty years ago. Everyone knows Saddam was a brutal dictator.

Mqurice



To: Ish who wrote (105666)7/16/2003 2:39:19 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
All credible inquiries came to one conclusion and one conclusion only -- Iraq did not have a post-91 nuke program.



To: Ish who wrote (105666)7/16/2003 6:19:32 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
You have not produced a report. Iraq had a nuclear program prior to 1991 and non thereafter. I am anxiously awaiting any report to the contrary. Cite sources and dates.