SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (105730)7/16/2003 2:18:25 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Danged Saddam was without doubt amassing programmes for weapons of mass destruction. He had hundreds of tons of programmes and those documents were already loaded into the nose cones, ready for launch in 45 minutes.

A single Yeti with a plan to make a weapon of mass destruction is a very scary thing. Imagine if he developed rapid fire programmes.

<Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us. And there is no doubt that his aggressive regional ambitions will lead him into future confrontations with his neighbors -- confrontations that will involve both the weapons he has today, and the ones he will continue to develop with his oil wealth. ... >

He obviously forgot to take the $800 million in cash with him, but he will have hidden 100 tons of programmes in his underground bunker for use if the Coalition Forces find him.

Mqurice



To: KLP who wrote (105730)7/16/2003 3:04:45 AM
From: spiral3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
that Cheney PR was dated August 26, 2002.

Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. .

Well there is now.

There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us. And there is no doubt that his aggressive regional ambitions will lead him into future confrontations with his neighbors -- confrontations that will involve both the weapons he has today, and the ones he will continue to develop with his oil wealth

Let’s say we both believe Chainme, and what he’s telling us is the absolute truth, which he implies that it is, by saying “no doubt”, - at least that’s how I understand it. What this means is that between August 26th and the start of the war Sadam got rid of his WMD. We know he didn’t use them, so already Cheney is wrong, but that’s not lieing, necessarily. We’re told they were scooted out of the country, which means they could be in the hands of al-Queda by now. So, when Sadam was contained we were sure where they were, but now that he isn’t, we aren’t. Feel any safer ? Let’s just hope that Sadam has the good grace to distinguish between the characteristics of leadership that I mentioned earlier on. Don’t hold your breath. This was supposed to be a slam dunk, not sure how much more time you want, to get these points on the board.

Should all his ambitions be realized, the implications would be enormous for the Middle East, for the United States, and for the peace of the world.

What’s this…he agrees that intentions are important, or is it an admission of doubt ?…he just said that there was none. Does this make him a liar, no, it’s only human to have no doubt and some doubt, all at the same time. Cheney can’t help but acknowledge this, it's beyond his control, so he doesn't. This is just our language and it's just the way we speak. I might not call him a liar for it, even though I think he is one.

As for the reaction of the Arab "street," the Middle East expert Professor Fouad Ajami predicts that after liberation, the streets in Basra and Baghdad are "sure to erupt in joy in the same way the throngs in Kabul greeted the Americans."

It would be difficult to be more wrong about something. I suppose Cheney didn’t really say this because Ajami did…whatever. The truth is hard to find, just because people feel lied to, doesn’t mean that a lie was told.

If you want to know what lurks at the heart of fascism, it's Certitude.



To: KLP who wrote (105730)7/16/2003 2:33:52 PM
From: GST  Respond to of 281500
 
Thanks, I was talking about early 2002 through the spring and not about this speech. Thanks for doing your own digging.