Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24552)	7/16/2003 11:13:30 AM
From: jonggua	Respond to of 206223

that congresswoman wouldn't by any chance be a, a, a democrat, would she?

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24552)	7/16/2003 1:12:03 PM
From: Dennis Roth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206223

ConocoPhillips says LNG proposal still not feasible news-miner.com ConocoPhillips says stance on LNG remains the same juneauempire.com ConocoPhillips tells Alaska state gas pipeline authority that its economic to ship Alaskan LNG to Asia and Asian LNG to California but not Alaskan LNG to California.

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (24552)	7/16/2003 5:04:52 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Respond to of 206223

One of those people is Rep. Lois Capps (D) of California. She is opposed to a proposal to locate an LNG facility on an offshore oil rig in Ventura County. "I am very concerned about this proposal, both for its potential for environmental problems and possible security problems," she told the House Energy and Commerce Committee last month. "Our tourist economy depends in large part on our beautiful coastline, and we don't want to risk it on more oil drilling." Here she is folks - y'all in California are truly blessed! I guess oil tankers are ok - after all they are not drill rigs - but LNG tankers - gee I thought they were ships too! loiscapps.org