SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (6787)7/16/2003 1:26:41 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 7720
 
If those really were the only words in question, what is all the fuss about? if the British government said they had learned that, then Bush was entitled to say it whether or not they were correct.

And of course, just because we can't prove that Hussein sought uranium from Africa doesn't mean he didn't do it. Anybody who thinks he had no interest at all in nuclear weapons is, IMO, blowing smoke.



To: TimF who wrote (6787)7/16/2003 5:53:22 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7720
 
If the war is justified by X and Y and Z and Z turns out to be false then there is still the X and Y justifications.
Quite so. Unless the Z justification was the salient one. Or the one that put the decision over the threshold. Or the X and Y turn out to be just as iffy as the Z.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News