Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (105912)	7/17/2003 2:44:34 AM
From: Bilow	Respond to of 281500

Hi Nadine Carroll; Re: "After all, the same people who are hoping the administration never finds any WMDs were the ones arguing before the war that Saddam would use WMDs on our troops and the war would create a humanitarian catastrophe with millions of refugees." I'm not "hoping" that the administration never finds any WMDs. It's already clear as a bell that there were no significant WMDs in Iraq. You're the one that's "hoping" that someone, anyone, finds at least ONE weapon of mass destruction in Iraq. So far you're tits up. Nor are there any Bilow quotes to the effect that Saddam would use WMDs (effectively) on our troops, or that there would be a humanitarian crisis with millions of refugees. -- Carl P.S. Eventually, if the mild guerilla war in Iraq grows strong enough, or if there is a virulent enough civil war, there could be a humanitarian crisis.