Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (105934)	7/17/2003 8:06:41 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I have pretty much had done with you. The major premise is that the US has not shown a propensity for using chemical and biological weapons, directly against troops, in any conflict of the last 50 years. Iraq has. Iraq, therefore, has no particular reason to guard against the United States, but every reason to safeguard its troops against the contingency of its own use of such weapons, especially when a toxin specific antidote is provided, for an agent they are known to have developed in the past.