Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (22495)	7/17/2003 10:23:16 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

What is it with the dems and perverts.....first Larry Flynt ....now Ritter....the kiddie diddler......is anyone supposed to take him seriously....???

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (22495)	7/17/2003 11:22:03 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Lots of presidents have "jeopardized" the country (imo)- but obviously they didn't in their opinion. When you look back historically you can see points where presidents made very bad decisions, but that cannot be the test, imo. We have to be careful what grounds we use to bring down a president- I think bringing down Clinton was stupid, and foolhardy, and set a recklessly low standard of operations. I would not to do to Bush, what I would not have wanted done to Clinton (even though, imo, this matter is far more serious- and I know we agree on that). Still, we must remember that whatever we do to Bush, will be done to democratic presidents, and we must be sure that we do not see policies we simply disagree with, as treason. I think we basically agree, though.