Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (105964)	7/17/2003 10:23:11 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I didn't say that they didn't have such ties to Al-Qaeda. But this is a "war on terror", no matter what group is responsible for target Americans. And it is IRREFUTABLE that Saddam provided support and sanctuary to Abu Nidal and Abu Abbas, both of whom are responsible for the loss of US lives. But I still believe that groups working as "cut-outs" for Saddam and other terrorist groups used Iraq as a transit and logistics base. Saddam's intelligence agencies would be far too smart to directly be involved in carrying out terrorist attacks against the US. But they were more than willing to support those who were. It seems that you are somewhat nostalgic for the days of Saddam's rule in Iraq. Lemmee guess.. the first thing you would recommend that we do is return him to power?? Hawk