Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rascal who wrote (106010)	7/17/2003 2:06:49 PM
From: spiral3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

"He certainly told us who the person was who was insistent on putting this language in which the CIA knew to be incredible, this language about the uranium shipment from Africa. And there was this negotiation between the White House and the CIA about just how far you could go and be close to the truth," Durbin said. McClellan responded: "I think that characterization is nonsense. It's not surprising coming from someone who is in a rather small minority in Congress that did not support the action that we took." Ok, so he contradix Durbin’s characterization, which can only refer to the use of the word “negotiation”, so he's probably right about that, unless he's talking about the word "insistent", or "how far you could go and be close to the truth". Durbin’s first statement is a matter of fact, or not. Someone’s name is floating out there - funny thing is, I was born in Durban.