Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (428519)	7/17/2003 3:11:17 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Face it: he was trying to make a case for war, so he hyped his evidence. Failing to find support for the claim within the US Intelligence community, he had to turn to the one foreign analysis which was congruent with the claim he wanted to make.

To: jlallen who wrote (428519)	7/17/2003 3:30:57 PM
From: Steve Dietrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Boy i really think you're whistling past the graveyard on this one. The CIA clearly thought the Africa/Uranium intelligence was suspect. But the Whitehouse wanted the allegations in the SOTU so they found language which was not a lie but was intentionally misleading. That's pretty indisputable. Meanwhile Novak wrote a recent article where "two high ranking administration officials" outed a CIA agent to him. That's potentially a very serious crime. It's amazing how selective the ethics of a partisan can be. Imagine these actions taken by an administration you didn't support. On another subject, how is it you consider the CIA assertions that those so called mobile bio-weapons labs are what they claim them to be, yet when the CIA concludes Bin Laden is alive due to analysis of tapes you say he's dead and that the CIA would lie about it? Steve