SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (106082)7/17/2003 4:00:43 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
LOL -- "I thought a case was being made for inevitable grave danger" -- spin it a thousand times and you get the same result -- no link to al Qaida, on WMDs, no nukes, no uranium purchases, no nuke program, no offensive weapons delivery capability, in a country that was economically bankrupt -- "no inevitable grave danger". No UN resolution. No legal basis for war.



To: Neocon who wrote (106082)7/17/2003 7:48:15 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 281500
 
<I never thought a case was being made for imminent danger>

Just drop it, OK? You're talking easily disproven nonsense. Any poster here who wants to, can find 100 quotes from top Administration officials, saying the threat was immanent. Which have been posted already, the last 15 times you did this "what is the definition of is" routine. Just drop it, please.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News