Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (36221)	7/18/2003 1:12:39 PM
From: Seeker of Truth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Maurice, I don't know Mr. Ramsey Su, but I do know Jay Chen. Your comment that he doesn't care about the good of mankind arises from a mistake. Both of his parents risked their health and spent many years for the good of mankind. They raised him in the same ethic. Now this mistake arises from the fact that you are only observing his comments on this board where, let's face it, the topic is how to get some more moola, not how to rescue mankind from this or that doom. I think a lot of us intend to make charitable use of some of that cash as well as provide for our families. How about assuming that people are altruists until proven otherwise? If you make this assumption you will certainly be disappointed some of the time but the rest of the time you will be justly characterizing people.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (36221)	7/18/2003 8:53:22 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Hello Maurice, <<They don't have that western 'good of mankind' ethic which leads us all too easily to Globalstar and to Tikrit. They see the world through a rose-coloured wallet. No noblesse oblige for them! … PS: How's that Jay … Bullseye?>> I wasn't even going to respond to the taunt, but, hey, wth, it is Saturday. As usual and as almost always, you are wrong, because you are micro-coded to be wrong. How quickly you forget that, whether or not the world benefited, you certainly did, by reading this first Message 15410107 <<February 26th, 2001>> and these subsequent posts (partial compilation links at tail end of post) … Message 17264030 <<March 30th, 2002>> in Jay’s effort to grip you by the wallet and raise you up the chain of food, from BBQ ribs to perhaps something like a boiled sausage. To figure out how much you gained by not losing, see QCOM chart for relevant period siliconinvestor.com If you, by the blah blah blah you posted, meant that it is difficult to convince Jay to load up on Globalstar by the Tonka-ful so as to fund some scoundrel’s early retirement in the Caribbean, or that it is complicated to induce Jay to lather up the sun screen and act as sunglass-wearing target drone in Tikrit while his officialdom in Port-of-Spain is wining merry night after scheming day and liming happy night after manipulative day, busily diluting Jay’s hard-earned fiat money and energetically clipping at Jay's pension construct, you are spot-on correct, for a change, enough to buy some coffee. Do you know why I am this way? Because I would be as thick as a whale sandwich otherwise, or, gad, be something like a BBQed rib, or golly, even somebody like you;0) I post to you in order to save you, altruistically, even though it is none of my business to do so, and you know better than most, I have really tried:0) Chugs, Jay

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (36221)	7/18/2003 10:59:04 PM
From: RealMuLan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Maurice, this post of yours sure sounds like racial profiling and some type of stereotype, and I am really disappointed at you. I just do not expect those come out of your mouth. enough said.