Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brian1501 who wrote (171950)	7/17/2003 9:51:36 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1578106

The issue of who provided what has been kicked back and forth over the past month. One minute its the CIA; the next its Brit. Intel. No one on either side of the Atlantic is providing a clear picture. That may be, but the point is still moot. In the speach Bush said British intelligence said it, so what the CIA knew and when is immaterial. So its moot because it MAY not be dependent on the forged documents? It doesn't matter whether it has a basis in fact or not......is that what you are telling us? That aside, it's preferable to have stuff like that sourced from the CIA, but the Dems trying to trump this up as him lying or misrepresenting are reaching (very far). You can tell yourself that if you like but from where I am sitting, this issue ain't going away anytime soon......on either side of the Atlantic. BTW the anti war commercials started today. And frankly, the Dems. had very little to do with this brouhaha. In fact, they are johnny come latelies to the issue.......much to my disappointment. ted